-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
Using Exceptionless for nodejs causes problems with AWS Lambda functions #140
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
That is setting up localstorage, there is also an InMemoryStorage implementation. I believe you can do something like: await Exceptionless.startup(c => {
c.apiKey = 'blah';
c.services.storage = new InMemoryStorage();
}); |
Hmm... that stinks. Guess we should put this line in a try catch and fallback to using InMemoryStorage if it fails. Could you create a PR for that? |
Should just need to try catch it. If it fails then it will default to in memory out of the box |
If I try/catch it, the Node* plugins being added on the following lines after line 22 won't have been added. I'm assuming that they are important and that I want to use them of course. |
@kareldonk This has been fixed in https://github.com/exceptionless/Exceptionless.JavaScript/releases/tag/v3.0.5 Please let us know if you have any questions. |
Thanks, that was quick. I already deployed it and it works. |
I tried using the exceptionless client for nodejs
@exceptionless/node
version3.0.4
as follows:When running the program as an AWS Lambda function, it throws the following error:
This is caused by the
NodeExceptionlessClient
class using theLocalStoragePolyfill
.It's not possible to write to the partition where the script runs on AWS Lambda as far as I know. I couldn't find a way to override the usage of the
LocalStoragePolyfill
to use memory storage either. Am I overlooking something or is this an issue that needs to be addressed?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: