Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Test renderer improvements #7258

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2016
Merged

Test renderer improvements #7258

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 13, 2016

Conversation

sophiebits
Copy link
Collaborator

Adds .update(newElement) and .unmount() and makes children reorders and composite type swapping work.

Part of #7148.

cc @josephsavona @cpojer @kentaromiura

Adds `.update(newElement)` and `.unmount()` and makes children reorders and composite type swapping work.

Part of facebook#7148.
@cpojer
Copy link
Contributor

cpojer commented Jul 13, 2016

awesome!

ReactTestComponent.prototype.getPublicInstance = function() {
// I can't say this makes a ton of sense but it seems better than throwing.
// Maybe we'll revise later if someone has a good use case.
return null;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would adding a warning call here be helpful to avoid any surprising behavior?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@iamdustan I think that would probably be overly noisy.

@josephsavona
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!!

@zpao zpao added this to the 15-next milestone Jul 13, 2016
@zpao zpao modified the milestones: 15-next, 15.3.0 Jul 13, 2016
zpao pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2016
Adds `.update(newElement)` and `.unmount()` and makes children reorders and composite type swapping work.

Part of #7148.
(cherry picked from commit caec8d5)
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants