Skip to content

Test with Ruby 3.1 #85

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 6, 2022
Merged

Test with Ruby 3.1 #85

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 6, 2022

Conversation

etagwerker
Copy link
Member

Hey,

This PR tests the library with Ruby 3.1.

Please check it out.

Thanks!

I will abide by the code of conduct.

@etagwerker etagwerker requested a review from a team as a code owner December 30, 2021 21:58
@etagwerker etagwerker requested review from bronzdoc and lubc and removed request for a team December 30, 2021 21:58
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 30, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #85 (d599753) into main (66a1167) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #85   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.26%   98.26%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines         462      462           
=======================================
  Hits          454      454           
  Misses          8        8           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 66a1167...d599753. Read the comment docs.

@etagwerker etagwerker linked an issue Dec 30, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
@kindoflew kindoflew self-requested a review January 3, 2022 15:52
@kindoflew
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me! and I guess GitHub Actions did QA for us? haha

@lubc lubc merged commit a62a57b into main Jan 6, 2022
@lubc lubc deleted the feature/ruby-3-1-0-support branch January 6, 2022 18:45
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Ruby 3.1.0 support
3 participants