-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
feat: sched: Finalize* move selectors #8710
Conversation
0fce142
to
8c6cba7
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feat/multi-sched #8710 +/- ##
====================================================
- Coverage 40.88% 40.85% -0.04%
====================================================
Files 691 692 +1
Lines 75992 76046 +54
====================================================
- Hits 31068 31067 -1
- Misses 39563 39617 +54
- Partials 5361 5362 +1
|
Hello, we're currently testing the remote finalize feature against some Ubuntu w/ ZFS NAS systems - but having the worker and miner on
|
|
Same as you... |
Do you have solved this issue ? |
Related Issues
On top of #8700 (to avoid conflicts and for easier testing - those PRs make most sense together)
Proposed Changes
move
worker selector, which will strongly prefer workers which can perform a local move of data (they either have both storage paths locally, or already have the sector in the correct local path)