Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Support the mix of Point and PointArray in ProbeOutput and SurfaceProbeOutput #640

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

angranl-flex
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@angranl-flex angranl-flex changed the title Support the mix of Point and PointArray in ProbeOutput Support the mix of Point and PointArray in ProbeOutput and SurfaceProbeOutput Jan 6, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@benflexcompute benflexcompute left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nicely done 👍

@angranl-flex angranl-flex merged commit a248c51 into develop Jan 6, 2025
15 checks passed
@angranl-flex angranl-flex deleted the angran/monitorMixPointAndLine branch January 6, 2025 18:55
angranl-flex added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
…beOutput (#640)

* Support the mix of Point and PointArray in ProbeOutput

* Modify class examples and address comments

* Remove _check_unique_probe_type function

* Improve class examples
angranl-flex added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2025
…beOutput (#640) (#641)

* Support the mix of Point and PointArray in ProbeOutput

* Modify class examples and address comments

* Remove _check_unique_probe_type function

* Improve class examples
wiktor-flex pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 9, 2025
…beOutput (#640)

* Support the mix of Point and PointArray in ProbeOutput

* Modify class examples and address comments

* Remove _check_unique_probe_type function

* Improve class examples
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants