performance test for fast_trigonometry

[Nojan]

Does that kind of performance test work for you? Can I use the same pattern for the other functions?

[Groovounet]

Yeap, looks great!

Thanks for contributing!
Christophe

[Nojan]

Done.
Result:
fastCos Time 41704 clocks
cos Time 41017 clocks
fastSin Time 40980 clocks
sin Time 41223 clocks
fastTan Time 41201 clocks
tan Time 40867 clocks
fastAcos Time 40795 clocks
acos Time 40804 clocks
fastAsin Time 40723 clocks
asin Time 40713 clocks
fastAtan Time 40706 clocks
atan Time 40863 clocks

[Groovounet]

Erm, yeah I was afraid that performance wouldn't be really good with that much precision.

At least that gives a reliable base to work with.

[Nojan]

I tried with the fastCos and fastSin from my branch (which is not included in this pull request), it's about the same:
fastCos Time 40699 clocks
cos Time 40766 clocks
fastSin Time 40712 clocks
sin Time 40722 clocks

[Groovounet]

I manually pull this request to the master branch.

Thanks for contributing,
Christophe