Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

added: 'operator<<(std::pair<tmat4x4<T,P>, tmat4x4<T,P>>)' routed to 'op... #333

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

regnirpsj
Copy link

...erator<<(std::pair<tmat4x4<T,P> const, tmat4x4<T,P> const>)' to avoid specifier removal by 'std::make_pair<>' and follow-up type-deduction problems; see [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29985791/]

…'operator<<(std::pair<tmat4x4<T,P> const, tmat4x4<T,P> const>)' to avoid specifier removal by 'std::make_pair<>' and follow-up type-deduction problems; see [http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29985791/]
@Groovounet Groovounet added the bug label May 1, 2015
@Groovounet Groovounet added this to the GLM 0.9.7 milestone May 1, 2015
@Groovounet Groovounet self-assigned this May 1, 2015
@Groovounet
Copy link
Member

Somehow the pull request doesn't merge automatically but I committed an equivalent fix.

Thanks for contributing,
Christophe

@Groovounet Groovounet closed this May 1, 2015
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants