-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 235
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Add an Azure storage backend that uses the Microsoft SDK #606
Comments
The existing jclouds implementation: |
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 2, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. This is incomplete; notably missing multi-part uploads and many other metadata and options. References #606.
This was referenced Oct 2, 2024
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 3, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. This is incomplete; notably missing multi-part uploads and many other metadata and options. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 4, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. The implementation is incomplete, notably lacking multi-part uploads and other error codes and options. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 5, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. The implementation is incomplete, notably lacking multi-part uploads and other error codes and options. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 5, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. The implementation is incomplete, notably lacking multi-part uploads and other error codes and options. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 5, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. The implementation is incomplete, notably lacking multi-part uploads and other error codes and options. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 5, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. The implementation is incomplete, lacking some error codes and options. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 5, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. The implementation lacks some error codes and options. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 5, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. The implementation lacks some error codes and options. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 6, 2024
This may replace the jclouds azureblob provider. The implementation lacks some error codes and options. Fixes #606.
This was referenced Oct 7, 2024
Closed
Closed
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 27, 2024
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 27, 2024
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 27, 2024
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 27, 2024
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 27, 2024
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 28, 2024
This addresses a layering violation and may make AzureBlobStore more useful to non-S3Proxy users. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 30, 2024
Also ETag and creation date. References #606.
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 8, 2024
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 11, 2024
gaul
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Dec 19, 2024
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
S3Proxy currently uses Apache jclouds for its Azure Blob integration. This uses the native REST API and has some advantages in terms of similar configuration and logging. However the Microsoft SDK has many more features including authentication that are popular user requests, e.g., #536. This might not be a lot of work to just create a
BlobStore
implementation that calls into the SDK.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: