fix: update dependencies #35
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bchelkowski
requested review from
enzuguri and
Borsuczio
and removed request for
a team
bchelkowski
force-pushed
the
fix-update-dependencies
branch
from
8211d90 to
69a03eb
Compare
kuldeepk-dazn
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2022
bchelkowski
force-pushed
the
fix-update-dependencies
branch
from
69a03eb to
f1186ca
Compare
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 5, 2022
## [1.3.1](v1.3.0...v1.3.1) (2022-08-05) ### Bug Fixes * update dependencies ([#35](#35)) ([7e317e0](7e317e0))
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.3.1 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What did you implement:
Update dependencies
How did you implement it:
By bumping npm packages versions
How can we verify it:
Install npm packages
Todos:
Is this ready for review?: YES
Is it a breaking change?: NO