Skip to content

feat: Store block timestamps. #44

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ajnavarro
Copy link
Collaborator

@ajnavarro ajnavarro commented Sep 3, 2024

I considered backward compatibility when adding the timestamp field into the JSON struct.

I took into account backward compatibility when adding the timestamp
field into the JSON struct.

I tried to add a test to check if we are still backward compatible. It
seems that the std.Tx struct changed over time, so we won't be able to
recover previous data.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Navarro Perez <antnavper@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Navarro Perez <antnavper@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Navarro Perez <antnavper@gmail.com>
Copy link

@deelawn deelawn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job. I left a few comments; nothing major.

Copy link
Member

@thehowl thehowl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-approve; agree with dylan's comments.

Signed-off-by: Antonio Navarro Perez <antnavper@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Antonio Navarro Perez <antnavper@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@zivkovicmilos zivkovicmilos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good 💯

@ajnavarro ajnavarro merged commit 83b3c2f into main Sep 30, 2024
3 checks passed
@ajnavarro ajnavarro deleted the feat/store-block-timestamps branch September 30, 2024 11:30
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants