Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Properly flush unique queues on startup (#23154) #23200

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 6, 2023

Conversation

GiteaBot
Copy link
Collaborator

Backport #23154

There have been a number of reports of PRs being blocked whilst being checked which have been difficult to debug. In investigating #23050 I have realised that whilst the Warn there is somewhat of a miscall there was a real bug in the way that the LevelUniqueQueue was being restored on start-up of the PersistableChannelUniqueQueue.

Next there is a conflict in the setting of the internal leveldb queue name - This wasn't being set so it was being overridden by other unique queues.

This PR fixes these bugs and adds a testcase.

Thanks to @brechtvl for noticing the second issue.

Fix #23050
and others

There have been a number of reports of PRs being blocked whilst being
checked which have been difficult to debug. In investigating go-gitea#23050 I
have realised that whilst the Warn there is somewhat of a miscall there
was a real bug in the way that the LevelUniqueQueue was being restored
on start-up of the PersistableChannelUniqueQueue.

Next there is a conflict in the setting of the internal leveldb queue
name - This wasn't being set so it was being overridden by other unique
queues.

This PR fixes these bugs and adds a testcase.

Thanks to @brechtvl  for noticing the second issue.

Fix go-gitea#23050
and others

---------

Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.18.6 milestone Feb 28, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Mar 3, 2023
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 6, 2023
@delvh delvh added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. and removed lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. labels Mar 6, 2023
@lunny lunny added lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. and removed lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. labels Mar 6, 2023
@lunny lunny merged commit 13f304d into go-gitea:release/v1.18 Mar 6, 2023
@lunny lunny removed the reviewed/wait-merge This pull request is part of the merge queue. It will be merged soon. label Mar 6, 2023
@go-gitea go-gitea locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2023
# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. type/bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants