Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

bump x/oauth2 & x/crypto (#33704) #33727

Merged

Conversation

techknowlogick
Copy link
Member

Backport dep bump

@GiteaBot GiteaBot added this to the 1.23.5 milestone Feb 26, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. label Feb 26, 2025
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 26, 2025
@techknowlogick techknowlogick changed the title bump x/oauth2 & x/crypto bump x/oauth2 & x/crypto (#33704) Feb 26, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. and removed lgtm/need 2 This PR needs two approvals by maintainers to be considered for merging. labels Feb 26, 2025
go 1.23
go 1.23.0

toolchain go1.23.6
Copy link
Member

@silverwind silverwind Feb 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know why go wants to introduce this toolchain directive and the .0 version here, but it seems like a go bug to me. See golang/go#65847 (comment) for my findings.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Likely the change itself is bening, toolchain is only a "suggestion" to the go compiler.

@silverwind
Copy link
Member

The build failure seems persistent and odd. It looks as if google/go-licenses does not create the output directory .go-licenses, but when I try the same locally, it works.

@silverwind
Copy link
Member

Pushed an attempt to fix license build with GOOS=linux.

@silverwind
Copy link
Member

#33747 will fix it, merge this after that one.

Copy link
Member

@silverwind silverwind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be mergeable after #33747 has backported.

@GiteaBot GiteaBot removed the lgtm/need 1 This PR needs approval from one additional maintainer to be merged. label Feb 28, 2025
@GiteaBot GiteaBot added the lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. label Feb 28, 2025
@techknowlogick techknowlogick merged commit d634e75 into go-gitea:release/v1.23 Feb 28, 2025
25 of 26 checks passed
@techknowlogick techknowlogick deleted the go-dep-bump-1.23 branch February 28, 2025 17:46
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
lgtm/done This PR has enough approvals to get merged. There are no important open reservations anymore. modifies/dependencies size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants