Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

FIX: Display 'No SBOM' in multi-arch images in HarborUI #21459

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bupd
Copy link
Contributor

@bupd bupd commented Jan 23, 2025

Thank you for contributing to Harbor!

Comprehensive Summary of your change

  • Previously, No SBOM label was displayed for multi-arch images.
  • Now, SBOM column is Empty for Multi-arch images. Since child artifacts may have their own SBOMs.

Changes made

  • Added the hasChild method to check for the presence of child images. aka. detecting multi-arch images.
  • If mulit-arch images present 'No SBOM' will not be displayed since child artifacts can contain their own SBOMs.
  • Added Tests.

Screenshots

Before

No SBOM

After (SBOM column is empty for multi-arch images)

childs will have no sbom disables

Issue being fixed

Fixes #21424

Please indicate you've done the following:

  • Well Written Title and Summary of the PR
  • Label the PR as needed. "release-note/update,area-ui"
  • Accepted the DCO. Commits without the DCO will delay acceptance.
  • Made sure tests are passing and test coverage is added if needed.
  • Considered the docs impact and opened a new docs issue or PR with docs changes if needed in website repository.

* Updated the `hasChild` method to check for the presence of
`child_digest` in the `references` array.
* This ensures that SBOMs are correctly displayed for multi-arch images,
where child artifacts may contain their own SBOMs.
* Previously, No SBOM label was displayed for multi-arch images.

Signed-off-by: bupd <bupdprasanth@gmail.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 46.24%. Comparing base (c8c11b4) to head (d06313b).
Report is 390 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #21459      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   45.36%   46.24%   +0.87%     
==========================================
  Files         244      247       +3     
  Lines       13333    13886     +553     
  Branches     2719     2876     +157     
==========================================
+ Hits         6049     6421     +372     
- Misses       6983     7127     +144     
- Partials      301      338      +37     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 46.24% <ø> (+0.87%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 491 files with indirect coverage changes

@MinerYang
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @bupd ,
Thanks for your contribution.
Could you provide a final demo of this PR changes, a screenshot is fine.

@Vad1mo Vad1mo added the release-note/update Update or Fix label Feb 3, 2025
@bupd
Copy link
Contributor Author

bupd commented Feb 3, 2025

@MinerYang Updated the PR description with screenshot.

Thanks

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
release-note/update Update or Fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

UI displays 'No SBOM' for multi-architecture images despite SBOM availability
6 participants