-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18k
x/tools/gopls/internal/regtest/workspace: failures with ‘Unmet: completed work "diagnosing initial workspace load"’ #50582
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
This appears to be more builder-specific than test-specific; maybe it's a bug in the test-runner infrastructure?
|
This means that gopls' initial workspace load is timing out on these builders: Consider the following excerpt from the logs:
I think a reasonable next step is to add additional instrumentation around loading: how long did |
Change https://golang.org/cl/380497 mentions this issue: |
We care that gopls operations complete within a reasonable time. However, what is “reasonable” depends strongly on the specifics of the user and the hardware they are running on: a timeout that would be perfectly reasonable on a high-powered user workstation with little other load may be far too short on an overloaded and/or underpowered CI builder. This change adjusts the regtest runner to use the test deadline instead of an arbitrary, flag-defined timeout; we expect the user or system running the test to scale the test timeout appropriately to the specific platform and system load. When the testing package gains support for per-test timeouts (golang/go#48157), this approach will automatically apply those timeouts too. If we decide that we also want to test specific performance and/or latency targets, we can set up specific configurations for that (as either aggressive per-test timeouts or benchmarks) in a followup change. For golang/go#50582 Change-Id: I1ab11b2049effb097aa620046fe11609269f91c4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/tools/+/380497 Trust: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com> Run-TryBot: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com> gopls-CI: kokoro <noreply+kokoro@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Robert Findley <rfindley@google.com>
greplogs --dashboard -md -l -e 'FAIL: TestFilters'
2022-01-12T19:47:40-d7a4bb4-f005df8/windows-arm64-10
And then there are a whole lot of
openbsd-386
failures on the builders affected by #49209, which IMO we can safely ignore:2022-01-12T01:49:33-d7a4bb4-3d3f5d9/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-11T18:17:05-d7a4bb4-a20724d/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-11T01:22:53-52e9527-9de1ac6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-10T04:23:42-94bfe68-6df0957/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-09T18:43:51-94bfe68-2639f2f/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-08T00:24:25-94bfe68-90860e0/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-07T17:27:56-94bfe68-9de1ac6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-07T06:34:04-351aaa6-11b28e7/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-07T05:34:58-351aaa6-9de1ac6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-07T01:36:17-a1300ed-c1e7c51/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-06T21:41:55-a1300ed-9de1ac6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-06T16:18:51-4754748-dbdf055/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-06T00:26:47-04daf88-b5bfaf4/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-05T21:22:03-04daf88-2b39d86/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-05T09:50:29-15409b5-2c58bb2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-05T01:53:39-15409b5-301db3f/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-04T20:54:25-15409b5-1242f43/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-03T23:45:12-ee1ca4f-95b240b/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2022-01-02T14:27:43-ee1ca4f-c886143/openbsd-386-70
2021-12-29T20:20:32-ee1ca4f-6178d25/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-28T19:29:29-ee1ca4f-1242f43/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-23T20:03:38-8d38310-b357b05/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-23T18:58:36-8d38310-af3b8cf/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-22T18:43:55-8d38310-0f3becf/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-16T11:15:33-8d38310-de690c2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-15T23:51:57-c6ae451-6e7c691/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-15T16:50:15-c6ae451-de690c2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-15T00:33:55-27fc764-9d0ca26/openbsd-386-70
2021-12-15T00:33:55-27fc764-9d0ca26/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-13T22:45:26-27fc764-5b9207f/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-12T06:14:07-27fc764-9c6e8f6/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-10T19:26:50-27fc764-766f89b/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-09T17:16:12-27fc764-78b4518/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-09T15:47:16-27fc764-de690c2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-09T13:07:36-3fca6a0-48d9489/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-08T23:38:20-3fca6a0-d6c4583/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-08T18:30:00-3fca6a0-61011de/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-08T16:15:56-3fca6a0-61317ef/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-08T04:14:00-fd2bfb7-a19e72c/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-07T20:13:17-d3358c1-61317ef/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-07T03:44:02-feb39d0-dc65c48/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-06T16:11:25-feb39d0-0f2d0d0/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-04T04:50:55-c882a49-549cfef/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-03T18:55:11-c882a49-c4a8550/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-03T18:55:11-c882a49-0f2d0d0/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-03T01:09:21-e212aff-0985990/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-02T20:02:34-e212aff-0f2d0d0/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-02T16:48:07-e212aff-36be0be/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-01T19:09:57-d99d6fa-0103fd2/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-12-01T15:05:46-615f9a6-b7651e5/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-30T22:42:17-1fd30d2-b7651e5/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-30T22:42:17-1fd30d2-7ccbcc9/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-30T18:09:02-2c9b078-931d80e/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-30T16:43:31-2c9b078-682435d/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-29T20:12:13-6e52f51-b7651e5/openbsd-386-70-n2d
2021-11-25T00:07:28-cb80a01-f7e34e7/openbsd-386-70
CC @findleyr
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: