Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Deprecate RepositoriesService.List #2988

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023
Merged

Conversation

WillAbides
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #2987

This deprecates RepositoriesService.List and replaces it with two new methods: RepositoriesService.ListByUser and RepositoriesService.ListByAuthenticatedUser. See #2987 for the justification.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2988 (11a8933) into master (a5b1cea) will decrease coverage by 0.18%.
The diff coverage is 41.66%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2988      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.11%   97.94%   -0.18%     
==========================================
  Files         149      149              
  Lines       12808    12836      +28     
==========================================
+ Hits        12567    12572       +5     
- Misses        166      188      +22     
- Partials       75       76       +1     
Files Coverage Δ
github/repos.go 96.19% <41.66%> (-2.70%) ⬇️

@WillAbides
Copy link
Contributor Author

To address @gmlewis's comment from the issue, I think the context of having a user parameter is enough to make it clear what ListByUser does.

Also, in the issue I proposed ListForUser and ListForAuthenticatedUser, but I changed it to ListByUser and ListByAuthenticatedUser because I found precedents "RepositoryService.ListByOrg" and "IssuesService.ListByRepo".

Copy link
Collaborator

@gmlewis gmlewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @WillAbides !
LGTM.

Awaiting second LGTM+Approval from any other contributor to this repo before merging.

@gmlewis gmlewis added the NeedsReview PR is awaiting a review before merging. label Nov 4, 2023
@gmlewis gmlewis removed the NeedsReview PR is awaiting a review before merging. label Nov 7, 2023
@gmlewis
Copy link
Collaborator

gmlewis commented Nov 7, 2023

Thank you, @valbeat !
Merging.

@gmlewis gmlewis merged commit 630bfdb into google:master Nov 7, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Unclear godoc for RepositoriesService.List
3 participants