Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Don't immediately lookup the linked binding associated with @ImplementedBy. Instead, defer it like a normal bind(X.class).to(Y.class) does. This ensures that later bindings of Y are used. #1709

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

copybara-service[bot]
Copy link

Don't immediately lookup the linked binding associated with @ImplementedBy. Instead, defer it like a normal bind(X.class).to(Y.class) does. This ensures that later bindings of Y are used.

Much thanks goes to @nineninesevenfour for their investigation (in #1650), which made fixing this much easier.

Fixes #700 and fixes #1650.

@copybara-service copybara-service bot closed this Apr 25, 2023
@copybara-service copybara-service bot deleted the test_527044205 branch April 25, 2023 19:53
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

binding order matters when requireExplicitBindings is on
0 participants