Better handling of adding oxidation states to large structures. #142
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I removed the custom oxidation state conversion featurizers and updated the code to use the latest improvements in pymatgen (materialsproject/pymatgen#1353) and matminer (hackingmaterials/matminer#339) so that large structures are handled gracefully.
This pull request (along with the matminer improvements) should also fix #138, as now the compositions are always calculated directly from the structure (after oxidation states have been added).
We should hold off merging this until both the matminer and pymatgen PR have been merged.