Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Better handling of adding oxidation states to large structures. #142

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 20, 2018

Conversation

utf
Copy link
Member

@utf utf commented Dec 6, 2018

I removed the custom oxidation state conversion featurizers and updated the code to use the latest improvements in pymatgen (materialsproject/pymatgen#1353) and matminer (hackingmaterials/matminer#339) so that large structures are handled gracefully.

This pull request (along with the matminer improvements) should also fix #138, as now the compositions are always calculated directly from the structure (after oxidation states have been added).

We should hold off merging this until both the matminer and pymatgen PR have been merged.

@ardunn
Copy link
Contributor

ardunn commented Dec 8, 2018

sweet thanks

@ardunn
Copy link
Contributor

ardunn commented Dec 15, 2018

should be good to try this again yeah?

@utf
Copy link
Member Author

utf commented Dec 15, 2018

Yeah, I'll take a look

@ardunn
Copy link
Contributor

ardunn commented Dec 17, 2018

@utf when can we merge this? I ask bc mp_all is still failing production runs because of oxidconversion problems. Maybe when we have the newest pymatgen in matminer (hackingmaterials/matminer#346) will this PR be ready?

@utf
Copy link
Member Author

utf commented Dec 20, 2018

Should be ready to merge when the Jarvis stuff gets added.

@ardunn ardunn merged commit db17b32 into hackingmaterials:master Dec 20, 2018
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Oxidation states guessed twice
2 participants