Submission page optimization #796
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several enhancements to the web application's submission form functionality. The changes focus on improving performance, user experience, and code organization. A new dependency, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying dapp with
|
| Latest commit: |
b6ec941
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://54452206.dapp-a9y.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feature-lazy-loading-submiss.dapp-a9y.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
205-222: WrapJSON.parsein a try/catch block to handle malformed JSON.
Although there’s a try/catch nearby,JSON.parse(encryptionResult)is outside it. An invalidencryptionResultwould cause an unhandled exception. Consider moving the parse inside the existing try block.- const { encryptedData, sessionKey } = JSON.parse(encryptionResult); + let parsedEncryption; + try { + parsedEncryption = JSON.parse(encryptionResult); + } catch (err) { + console.error(err); + return alert("Failed to parse encryption result. Please contact HATS team."); + } + const { encryptedData, sessionKey } = parsedEncryption;
🧹 Nitpick comments (11)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/encrypt.ts (5)
6-7: Consider encapsulating the cache to handle potential concurrency or multi-tenant usage.
Using a sharedencryptionCacheMapat module level may lead to race conditions or unexpected behavior if multiple users or threads invoke these functions simultaneously. A more robust solution might include storing the cache in a service or class with synchronization where needed.
8-11: Avoid using raw data as part of the cache key to prevent large memory footprints.
Including the entire data to encrypt in the key could cause memory bloat if the data is large or frequently changes. Consider using a hash (e.g., SHA-256) instead.- const cacheKey = Array.isArray(publicKeyOrKeys) - ? `keys-${dataToEncrypt}-${publicKeyOrKeys.join(',')}` - : `key-${dataToEncrypt}-${publicKeyOrKeys}`; + import { createHash } from "crypto"; + ... + const contentHash = createHash("sha256").update(dataToEncrypt).digest("hex"); + const keyPart = Array.isArray(publicKeyOrKeys) + ? publicKeyOrKeys.join(",") + : publicKeyOrKeys; + const cacheKey = `keys-${contentHash}-${keyPart}`;
25-33: Allow customizing public key algorithm security.
Currently,config.rejectPublicKeyAlgorithms = new Set()accepts all algorithms. Consider tightening this set in accordance with your security requirements to reduce exposure to weaker algorithms.
47-50: Validate whether re-throwing the raw error might leak sensitive info.
Pressingconsole.errorplusthrow errorcan inadvertently expose details about internal encryption or keys. Consider a sanitized error message in production.Would you like help crafting a more secure error-handling strategy, such as redacting sensitive details?
Also applies to: 88-89
98-107: Cache key for CID is effective, but consider reusing a dedicated cache or limit logic.
Similar to encryption, you might want to apply an equivalent max-size limit to the CID cache to keep memory usage stable.packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (4)
17-18: Check for consistency in usage of custom hooks.
WhileuseSubmissionDebounceis introduced here, there is also a manually implemented debounce at lines 605-615. Consider standardizing on a single approach to avoid code duplication.
596-604: Potential duplication of severities logic.
You already setseveritiesOptionsin lines ~80-90. This second approach viaseveritiesOptionsMemoduplicates much of that logic. Consider centralizing this to avoid confusion.
626-660: Caching GitHub issues in sessionStorage.
This approach improves performance by reducing repeated calls. Consider implementing a stale-while-revalidate or expiration mechanism if data can become outdated.
685-747: Consider modularization to reduce component size.
This block is quite large. Extracting form sections or repetitive elements into sub-components can simplify code navigation and testing.packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/hooks/useSubmissionDebounce.ts (2)
5-12: Use a configurable delay.
Hardcoding 300ms is fine for many cases, but consider making it a parameter so it can be tuned for various form requirements.
30-35: Likewise for test files.
Similar logic applies as withdebouncedHandleFixFiles. Consider unified logic if these two are functionally identical.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
packages/web/package.json(1 hunks)packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx(6 hunks)packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/styles.ts(1 hunks)packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/encrypt.ts(2 hunks)packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/hooks/useSubmissionDebounce.ts(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (16)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/encrypt.ts (2)
17-22: Good usage of explicit validation for public keys.
Throwing an error for empty or invalid public keys helps guard against encryption misconfigurations.
93-96: Ensure calls toclearEncryptionCacheare strategically placed.
While helpful for freeing memory, frequently clearing the cache could degrade performance since re-encryption becomes necessary. Make sure it’s only called under well-defined circumstances.packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (7)
2-10: No major concerns regarding these new imports.
They appear consistent with the overall structure and do not introduce any obvious conflicts or duplicates.
29-32: Imports look appropriate.
All newly introduced imports (downloadjs, moment, getGithubIssuesFromVault) are used correctly and appear necessary for the new functionalities.
34-45: New styled component extensions look good.
The.load-more-triggerblock has readable styles for pagination triggers. Ensure the design matches the rest of the form theme.
293-293: No direct issues noted on this line.
No additional context or changes are apparent; safe to leave as is.
616-624: Good use of memoization for performance.
MemoizingcontrolledDescriptionscan help limit re-renders, especially as the data grows. No issues found.
661-682: Effective pagination logic.
UsinguseInViewto load more items on scroll is clear and well-structured. Confirm that large data sets do not affect memory usage or performance.
752-756: On-click logic is correct but watch for user flow.
Appending a new submission and incrementingvisibleSubmissionsis fine. Ensure that users have a clear path if they need to remove extra entries.packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/hooks/useSubmissionDebounce.ts (3)
1-4: File-level comment:
This new hook is a welcome addition for debounced field updates. Overall structure is solid and leveragesuseCallback.
24-29: Potential memory usage checks.
Ensure that multiple calls to debounced file handlers don’t risk leaving un-cleared timeouts if the user repeatedly triggers file changes in short intervals.
36-43: Return object structure looks clear.
All debounced methods are conveniently accessible. Code is concise and maintainable.packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/styles.ts (3)
8-11: Consistent spacing and layout changes.
Increasing the gap and setting width/position are aligned with the new pagination requirement. No issues found.
12-20: New.load-more-triggerstyles.
This styling properly centers the loading indicator. Check that color contrast meets accessibility requirements if the background is darker.
[approve]
24-26: Fine-tuned button layout.
Usingjustify-content: flex-end;clarifies the form’s call-to-action. Looks good and consistent.packages/web/package.json (1)
123-123: LGTM! Verify the package version and bundle size impact.The addition of
react-intersection-observeraligns well with the PR objectives for implementing scroll-based pagination. However, let's verify:
- That we're using the latest stable version
- The impact on bundle size
✅ Verification successful
✅ Version and bundle size verified - good to go!
The package is at the latest version (9.15.1) and has minimal bundle impact (1.6KB gzipped) with zero dependencies.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check latest version and bundle size impact of react-intersection-observer # Check NPM for latest version echo "Latest version from NPM:" npm show react-intersection-observer version # Check bundle size impact echo -e "\nBundle size impact:" curl -s "https://bundlephobia.com/api/size?package=react-intersection-observer@9.15.1" | jq '{ size: .size, gzip: .gzip, dependencyCount: .dependencyCount }'Length of output: 392
| // Limit cache size to prevent memory leaks | ||
| if (encryptionCache.size > 100) { | ||
| const firstKey = Array.from(encryptionCache.keys())[0]; | ||
| if (firstKey) { | ||
| encryptionCache.delete(firstKey); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract the cache limit logic into a shared helper.
Duplicated logic for "cache size > 100 ⇒ remove the first key" appears in both encryption functions. Refactoring this into a single helper will simplify updates and maintain consistency across future caching expansions.
+ function enforceCacheLimit(cache: Map<string, string>, limit: number) {
+ if (cache.size > limit) {
+ const firstKey = cache.keys().next().value;
+ if (firstKey) {
+ cache.delete(firstKey);
+ }
+ }
+ }
...
- if (encryptionCache.size > 100) {
- const firstKey = Array.from(encryptionCache.keys())[0];
- if (firstKey) {
- encryptionCache.delete(firstKey);
- }
- }
+ enforceCacheLimit(encryptionCache, 100);Also applies to: 79-84
| // Debounce form updates | ||
| const debouncedSetValue = useCallback( | ||
| (name: FieldPath<ISubmissionsDescriptionsData>, value: any) => { | ||
| const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => { | ||
| setValue(name, value, { shouldValidate: true }); | ||
| }, 300); | ||
| return () => clearTimeout(timeoutId); | ||
| }, | ||
| [setValue] | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unify debounce logic with the new hook.
You’re introducing a separate in-file debounce logic, but there is already useSubmissionDebounce. Merging these would reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
212-229: Add error boundary for encryption operations.The encryption handling could benefit from more robust error handling and user feedback.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
+ const handleEncryption = async (data: string, keys: string | string[]) => { + try { + const result = await encryptWithKeys(keys, data); + if (!result) throw new Error("Encryption failed"); + return JSON.parse(result); + } catch (error) { + console.error("Encryption error:", error); + throw new Error("Failed to encrypt submission data"); + } + }; - const encryptionResult = await encryptWithKeys(keyOrKeys, toEncrypt); - if (!encryptionResult) return alert("This vault doesn't have any valid key, please contact hats team"); - const { encryptedData, sessionKey } = JSON.parse(encryptionResult); + try { + const { encryptedData, sessionKey } = await handleEncryption(toEncrypt, keyOrKeys);
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/hooks/useSubmissionDebounce.ts (1)
13-51: Consider adding cleanup and error handling.While the implementation is generally good, there are a few improvements that could be made:
- The debounced functions should handle cleanup on unmount.
- Error handling for file operations could be more robust.
Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
export function useSubmissionDebounce(setValue: UseFormSetValue<ISubmissionsDescriptionsData>): ISubmissionDebounceHook { + // Store timeout IDs for cleanup + const timeoutRefs = useRef<{[key: string]: NodeJS.Timeout}>({}); + // Debounced form updates with type safety const debouncedSetValue = useCallback((name: FieldPath<ISubmissionsDescriptionsData>, value: any) => { + // Clear existing timeout for this field + if (timeoutRefs.current[name]) { + clearTimeout(timeoutRefs.current[name]); + } + const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => { setValue(name, value, { shouldValidate: true }); + delete timeoutRefs.current[name]; }, 300); + + timeoutRefs.current[name] = timeoutId; return () => clearTimeout(timeoutId); }, [setValue]); // File handlers with error handling const debouncedHandleFixFiles = useCallback(async (index: number, files: File[]) => { if (!files?.length) return; + try { debouncedSetValue(`descriptions.${index}.complementFixFiles`, files); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error handling fix files:', error); + } }, [debouncedSetValue]); const debouncedHandleTestFiles = useCallback(async (index: number, files: File[]) => { if (!files?.length) return; + try { debouncedSetValue(`descriptions.${index}.complementTestFiles`, files); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Error handling test files:', error); + } }, [debouncedSetValue]); + // Cleanup on unmount + useEffect(() => { + return () => { + Object.values(timeoutRefs.current).forEach(clearTimeout); + }; + }, []); return { debouncedSetValue, debouncedUpdateDescription, debouncedUpdateTitle, debouncedHandleFixFiles, debouncedHandleTestFiles }; }packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (1)
682-737: Consider adding error boundaries for the submission list.While the rendering logic is good, it could benefit from error boundaries to handle rendering failures gracefully.
Create a new error boundary component:
// SubmissionErrorBoundary.tsx import React, { Component, ErrorInfo, ReactNode } from 'react'; interface Props { children: ReactNode; } interface State { hasError: boolean; } export class SubmissionErrorBoundary extends Component<Props, State> { public state: State = { hasError: false }; public static getDerivedStateFromError(_: Error): State { return { hasError: true }; } public componentDidCatch(error: Error, errorInfo: ErrorInfo) { console.error('Submission rendering error:', error, errorInfo); } public render() { if (this.state.hasError) { return <div>Error loading submission. Please try refreshing the page.</div>; } return this.props.children; } }Then wrap the submission rendering:
- {visibleDescriptions.map((submissionDescription, index) => ( + {visibleDescriptions.map((submissionDescription, index) => ( + <SubmissionErrorBoundary key={submissionDescription.id}> <StyledSubmissionDescription isEncrypted={!!submissionDescription.isEncrypted}> {/* ... */} </StyledSubmissionDescription> + </SubmissionErrorBoundary> ))}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx(8 hunks)packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/encrypt.ts(2 hunks)packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/hooks/useSubmissionDebounce.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/encrypt.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/hooks/useSubmissionDebounce.ts (1)
5-11: LGTM! Well-defined interface with clear type definitions.The interface is well-structured and provides good type safety for the hook's return value.
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (2)
92-97: LGTM! Good integration of the debounce hook.The hook usage is clean and well-organized, properly destructuring only the needed functions.
604-678: Excellent performance optimizations!The implementation includes several good performance optimizations:
- Memoized severities options
- Memoized controlled descriptions
- GitHub issues caching
- Efficient pagination with useInView
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (3)
96-108: Consider consolidating related state.The memoization implementation is good, but consider consolidating GitHub-related states into a single object to reduce state updates and improve maintainability:
-const [vaultGithubIssuesOpts, setVaultGithubIssuesOpts] = useState<FormSelectInputOption[] | undefined>(); -const [vaultGithubIssues, setVaultGithubIssues] = useState<GithubIssue[] | undefined>(undefined); -const [isLoadingGH, setIsLoadingGH] = useState<boolean>(false); +const [githubState, setGithubState] = useState<{ + issues: GithubIssue[] | undefined; + options: FormSelectInputOption[] | undefined; + isLoading: boolean; +}>({ + issues: undefined, + options: undefined, + isLoading: false +});
169-196: Enhance error handling in GitHub issues loading.The error handling could be improved by providing more specific error messages and implementing retry logic for transient failures.
const loadGithubIssues = async () => { if (!vault || !claimedIssues || isLoadingGH) return; try { setIsLoadingGH(true); const ghIssues = await getGithubIssuesFromVault(vault); // ... rest of the code } catch (error) { - console.error('Failed to load GitHub issues:', error); + const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error'; + console.error('Failed to load GitHub issues:', errorMessage); + // Consider implementing retry logic here } finally { setIsLoadingGH(false); } };
Line range hint
288-549: Consider breaking down the form into smaller components.The form rendering logic is quite complex and could benefit from being split into smaller, more manageable components. This would improve maintainability and reusability.
Consider extracting these into separate components:
- FileUploadSection
- GithubIssueSelector
- TestFilesSection
- FixFilesSection
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx(8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx
[error] 565-565: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (3)
1-45: LGTM! Clean organization of imports and styled components.The new imports and styled components setup are well-structured, with clear separation of concerns.
Line range hint
621-707: LGTM! Well-implemented infinite scroll and conditional rendering.The component rendering includes proper loading states and efficient infinite scroll implementation using intersection observer.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 565-565: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
550-620: Add input validation before processing submission.Consider adding validation checks before processing the submission to ensure all required data is present and correctly formatted.
const handleSaveAndDownloadDescription = async (formData: ISubmissionsDescriptionsData) => { if (!vault) return; if (!submissionData) return alert("Please fill previous steps first."); + + // Validate required data + if (!formData.descriptions?.length) { + alert("Please add at least one description before submitting."); + return; + } + + // Validate each description + for (const desc of formData.descriptions) { + if (!desc.title?.trim()) { + alert("All descriptions must have a title."); + return; + } + } try { // ... rest of the code🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 565-565: Avoid the use of spread (
...) syntax on accumulators.Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in
.reduce) because it causes a time complexity ofO(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
| vault.description?.committee.members.reduce( | ||
| (prev: string[], curr) => [...prev, ...curr["pgp-keys"].map((key) => key.publicKey)], | ||
| [] | ||
| ) ?? []; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix O(n²) complexity in reduce operation.
The spread operator in the reduce accumulator creates O(n²) time complexity. Consider using array methods with O(n) complexity instead.
-vault.description?.committee.members.reduce(
- (prev: string[], curr) => [...prev, ...curr["pgp-keys"].map((key) => key.publicKey)],
- []
-) ?? [];
+vault.description?.committee.members.flatMap(
+ (member) => member["pgp-keys"].map((key) => key.publicKey)
+) ?? [];📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| vault.description?.committee.members.reduce( | |
| (prev: string[], curr) => [...prev, ...curr["pgp-keys"].map((key) => key.publicKey)], | |
| [] | |
| ) ?? []; | |
| vault.description?.committee.members.flatMap( | |
| (member) => member["pgp-keys"].map((key) => key.publicKey) | |
| ) ?? []; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 565-565: Avoid the use of spread (...) syntax on accumulators.
Spread syntax should be avoided on accumulators (like those in .reduce) because it causes a time complexity of O(n^2).
Consider methods such as .splice or .push instead.
(lint/performance/noAccumulatingSpread)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/web/src/hooks/auditFrameGame/auditFrameGameService.ts (2)
14-15: Consider enhancing error handling with more granular error reporting.While using
console.erroris more appropriate thanconsole.log, the current implementation might hide important issues from users. Consider these improvements:
- Distinguish between different error types (network, validation, etc.)
- Provide more context to the caller about why the operation failed
} catch (error) { - console.error("Error opting in to audit competition:", error); - // Don't throw, just return false to indicate failure - return false; + console.error("Error opting in to audit competition:", error); + // Return structured error response + return { + success: false, + error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error occurred', + code: error.response?.status || 'UNKNOWN' + }; }
30-31: Consider consolidating error handling logic.The error handling logic is duplicated across functions. Consider extracting it into a shared utility function.
+// Add at the top of the file +interface ServiceResponse<T> { + success: boolean; + data?: T; + error?: string; + code?: string; +} + +function handleServiceError(error: unknown, context: string): ServiceResponse<never> { + console.error(`Error ${context}:`, error); + return { + success: false, + error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error occurred', + code: error.response?.status || 'UNKNOWN' + }; +} } catch (error) { - console.error("Error opting out from audit competition:", error); - // Don't throw, just return false to indicate failure - return false; + return handleServiceError(error, "opting out from audit competition"); }packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/SubmissionFormPage.tsx (2)
80-88: Enhance contract error feedback to users.While the error handling logic is correct, it silently resets the form without informing users about what went wrong during the contract interaction.
Consider adding user feedback when contract errors occur:
if (error) { + confirm({ + title: t("contractError"), + titleIcon: <ErrorIcon className="mr-2" fontSize="large" />, + description: t("contractErrorExplanation", { error: error.message }), + confirmText: t("gotIt"), + }); reset(); return; }
242-302: Consider decomposing the submission function for better maintainability.While the validation logic is thorough, the function handles multiple concerns (signature validation, audit wizard verification, submission). Consider breaking it down into smaller, focused functions.
Example refactor:
+const verifyMessageSignature = async (vault, userHasCollectedSignature, confirm, t, navigate) => { + if (!vault?.description?.["project-metadata"]) return true; + + if (!userHasCollectedSignature) { + const wantsToBeRedirected = await confirm({ + title: t("youNeedToSignMessageToSubmit"), + titleIcon: <ErrorIcon className="mr-2" fontSize="large" />, + description: t("youNeedToSignMessageToSubmitExplanation"), + cancelText: t("close"), + confirmText: t("gotIt"), + }); + + if (!wantsToBeRedirected) return false; + + const isAudit = vault.description["project-metadata"].type === "audit"; + const name = vault.description["project-metadata"].name ?? ""; + const mainRoute = `/${isAudit ? HoneypotsRoutePaths.audits : HoneypotsRoutePaths.bugBounties}`; + const vaultSlug = slugify(name); + + navigate(`${mainRoute}/${vaultSlug}-${vault.id}`); + return false; + } + return true; +}; + +const verifyAuditWizardSubmission = async (submissionData, confirm, t) => { + if (submissionData.ref !== "audit-wizard") return true; + if (!submissionData.auditWizardData) return false; + + const auditwizardSubmission = getCurrentAuditwizardSubmission(submissionData.auditWizardData, submissionData); + + if (JSON.stringify(submissionData.auditWizardData) !== JSON.stringify(auditwizardSubmission)) { + await confirm({ + title: t("submissionChanged"), + titleIcon: <ErrorIcon className="mr-2" fontSize="large" />, + description: t("submissionChangedExplanationAuditWizard"), + confirmText: t("gotIt"), + }); + return false; + } + + const res = await verifyAuditWizardSignature(auditwizardSubmission); + if (!res) { + await confirm({ + title: t("submissionNotValid"), + titleIcon: <ErrorIcon className="mr-2" fontSize="large" />, + description: t("submissionNotValidExplanationAuditWizard"), + confirmText: t("gotIt"), + }); + return false; + } + return true; +}; const submitSubmission = useCallback(async () => { if (!vault) return; if (!submissionData?.submissionsDescriptions?.submission) return; try { - // Check if vault requires message signature to submit - if (requireMessageSignature && !userHasCollectedSignature) { - const wantsToBeRedirected = await confirm({...}); - if (!wantsToBeRedirected) return; - const isAudit = vault?.description?.["project-metadata"].type === "audit"; - const name = vault?.description?.["project-metadata"].name ?? ""; - const mainRoute = `/${isAudit ? HoneypotsRoutePaths.audits : HoneypotsRoutePaths.bugBounties}`; - const vaultSlug = slugify(name); - return navigate(`${mainRoute}/${vaultSlug}-${vault.id}`); + // Verify message signature if required + if (requireMessageSignature) { + const isValid = await verifyMessageSignature(vault, userHasCollectedSignature, confirm, t, navigate); + if (!isValid) return; } const submission = submissionData?.submissionsDescriptions?.submission; const calculatedCid = await calcCid(submission); - if (submissionData.ref === "audit-wizard") {...} + // Verify audit wizard submission if applicable + const isValid = await verifyAuditWizardSubmission(submissionData, confirm, t); + if (!isValid) return; await sendVulnerabilityOnChain(calculatedCid); } catch (error) {...} }, [sendVulnerabilityOnChain, submissionData, confirm, requireMessageSignature, userHasCollectedSignature, navigate, vault, t]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/web/src/hooks/auditFrameGame/auditFrameGameService.ts(3 hunks)packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/SubmissionFormPage.tsx(5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/web/src/hooks/auditFrameGame/auditFrameGameService.ts (1)
46-47: Consider security and performance implications of silent failures.Silently returning an empty array on error could:
- Hide security-relevant failures
- Impact user experience if the data is critical
- Miss opportunities for request retries or caching
Consider implementing:
- Rate limiting and request caching
- Retry mechanism for transient failures
- Error reporting to monitoring systems
Let's verify the usage of this function to understand the impact:
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/SubmissionFormPage.tsx (2)
104-118: LGTM! Comprehensive error handling for server submission failures.The implementation properly updates the UI state to reflect submission failures, ensuring users are aware of the status.
Line range hint
202-235: LGTM! Well-implemented error handling with clear user feedback.The server submission function properly handles errors, logs them, and provides clear feedback to users through confirmation dialogs.
| // Handle contract errors | ||
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (contractError) { | ||
| reset(); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [contractError]); | ||
|
|
||
| // Clear submission data if chain changes | ||
| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (submissionData?.submissionResult?.chainId && chain?.id && submissionData.submissionResult.chainId !== chain.id) { | ||
| reset(); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [chain?.id]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add user confirmation before resetting form data.
While validating chain changes is crucial, resetting the form without warning could lead to unexpected data loss for users.
Consider adding user confirmation:
// Clear submission data if chain changes
useEffect(() => {
if (submissionData?.submissionResult?.chainId && chain?.id && submissionData.submissionResult.chainId !== chain.id) {
- reset();
+ confirm({
+ title: t("chainChanged"),
+ titleIcon: <ErrorIcon className="mr-2" fontSize="large" />,
+ description: t("chainChangeResetWarning"),
+ confirmText: t("resetForm"),
+ cancelText: t("cancel"),
+ }).then((confirmed) => {
+ if (confirmed) reset();
+ });
}
-}, [chain?.id]);
+}, [chain?.id, confirm, t]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Handle contract errors | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (contractError) { | |
| reset(); | |
| } | |
| }, [contractError]); | |
| // Clear submission data if chain changes | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (submissionData?.submissionResult?.chainId && chain?.id && submissionData.submissionResult.chainId !== chain.id) { | |
| reset(); | |
| } | |
| }, [chain?.id]); | |
| // Handle contract errors | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (contractError) { | |
| reset(); | |
| } | |
| }, [contractError]); | |
| // Clear submission data if chain changes | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (submissionData?.submissionResult?.chainId && chain?.id && submissionData.submissionResult.chainId !== chain.id) { | |
| confirm({ | |
| title: t("chainChanged"), | |
| titleIcon: <ErrorIcon className="mr-2" fontSize="large" />, | |
| description: t("chainChangeResetWarning"), | |
| confirmText: t("resetForm"), | |
| cancelText: t("cancel"), | |
| }).then((confirmed) => { | |
| if (confirmed) reset(); | |
| }); | |
| } | |
| }, [chain?.id, confirm, t]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/SubmissionFormPage.tsx (1)
Line range hint
227-260: Consider adding retry mechanism for server submissions.While the error handling is good, for better reliability, consider implementing a retry mechanism with exponential backoff for server submissions.
const sendSubmissionToServer = useCallback( async (data: ISubmissionData) => { if (!vault || !data || !data.submissionResult) return; + const maxRetries = 3; + let retryCount = 0; try { setSubmissionData({ ...data, submissionResult: { ...data.submissionResult, botStatus: SubmissionOpStatus.Pending, auditCompetitionRepo: undefined }, }); + while (retryCount < maxRetries) { + try { const res = await submitVulnerabilitySubmission(data, vault, hackerProfile); if (res.success) { setSubmissionData({ ...data, submissionResult: { ...data.submissionResult, botStatus: SubmissionOpStatus.Success, auditCompetitionRepo: res.auditCompetitionRepo, }, }); return; } + throw new Error("Failed to submit vulnerability"); + } catch (error) { + retryCount++; + if (retryCount === maxRetries) throw error; + await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, Math.pow(2, retryCount) * 1000)); + } + } } catch (error) { console.error("Error sending submission to server:", error);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
packages/shared/src/config/chains.ts(1 hunks)packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/SubmissionFormPage.tsx(5 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (5)
packages/shared/src/config/chains.ts (1)
81-81: Verify alternative provider configuration exists.The removal of hardcoded provider URLs is good for security, but we need to ensure that alternative provider configuration exists to maintain functionality.
Run the following script to check for alternative provider configuration:
Also applies to: 81-81, 81-81, 81-81, 81-81, 81-81
✅ Verification successful
Provider configuration is properly maintained with multiple fallbacks
The removal of hardcoded provider URLs is safe as the system implements a robust three-tier fallback mechanism:
- Infura provider as primary (using INFURA_API_KEY)
- Chain-specific JSON-RPC providers as secondary
- Public provider as final fallback
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for provider configuration in the codebase # Look for provider configuration patterns echo "Searching for provider configuration..." rg -A 5 "configureChains|getDefaultProvider|JsonRpcProvider|createPublicClient" # Look for environment variable usage for providers echo "Searching for environment variables related to providers..." rg "process\.env\..*PROVIDER|process\.env\..*RPC"Length of output: 1366
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get the complete wagmi configuration echo "=== Complete wagmi configuration ===" cat packages/web/src/config/wagmi.ts # Look for environment files echo -e "\n=== Environment files ===" fd -g ".env*" # Check chain configuration echo -e "\n=== Chain configuration ===" cat packages/shared/src/config/chains.tsLength of output: 13041
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/SubmissionFormPage.tsx (4)
80-88: LGTM! Improved contract error handling.The addition of contract error handling and immediate form reset on error improves user experience by preventing the form from being stuck in an invalid state.
104-118: LGTM! Enhanced server submission error handling.Good addition of error handling for server submission failures, with proper state updates to reflect the failure in the UI.
130-167: LGTM! Comprehensive chain change handling.Excellent implementation of chain change handling with user confirmation and clear guidance for switching back to the original chain.
267-327: LGTM! Comprehensive submission validation.Good implementation of submission validation with proper error handling and user feedback. The code checks for message signature requirements, audit wizard submissions, and handles errors appropriately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (1)
Line range hint
450-500: Reduce duplication in file upload handling.The file upload handling logic is duplicated between fix and test files. Extract this into a reusable component:
interface FileUploadProps { label: string; name: string; files: Array<{ file: File; path: string; pathOpts: string[] }>; onFileChange: (files: File[]) => void; onFileRemove: (index: number) => void; onPathChange: (index: number, path: string) => void; } function FileUploadSection({ label, name, files, onFileChange, onFileRemove, onPathChange }: FileUploadProps) { // ... common file upload logic }Also applies to: 500-550
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (4)
1-20: Consider optimizing imports for better bundle size.Consider importing specific icons instead of the full package to reduce bundle size:
-import AddIcon from "@mui/icons-material/AddOutlined"; -import CloseIcon from "@mui/icons-material/CloseOutlined"; -import RemoveIcon from "@mui/icons-material/DeleteOutlined"; -import FlagIcon from "@mui/icons-material/OutlinedFlagOutlined"; +import { AddOutlined as AddIcon } from "@mui/icons-material"; +import { CloseOutlined as CloseIcon } from "@mui/icons-material"; +import { DeleteOutlined as RemoveIcon } from "@mui/icons-material"; +import { OutlinedFlagOutlined as FlagIcon } from "@mui/icons-material";
59-59: Extract magic number into a named constant.The number 5 should be extracted into a named constant at the top of the file for better maintainability:
+const ITEMS_PER_PAGE = 5; -const [visibleSubmissions, setVisibleSubmissions] = useState<number>(5); // ITEMS_PER_PAGE = 5 +const [visibleSubmissions, setVisibleSubmissions] = useState<number>(ITEMS_PER_PAGE);
168-196: Extract GitHub issues loading logic into a custom hook.The GitHub issues loading logic is complex enough to warrant its own custom hook. This would improve reusability and make the component more focused:
function useGithubIssues(vault: Vault | null, claimedIssues: ClaimedIssue[] | null) { const [isLoadingGH, setIsLoadingGH] = useState<boolean>(false); const [vaultGithubIssues, setVaultGithubIssues] = useState<GithubIssue[] | undefined>(); const [vaultGithubIssuesOpts, setVaultGithubIssuesOpts] = useState<FormSelectInputOption[] | undefined>(); useEffect(() => { const loadGithubIssues = async () => { // ... existing loading logic }; loadGithubIssues(); }, [vault, claimedIssues]); return { isLoadingGH, vaultGithubIssues, vaultGithubIssuesOpts }; }
557-571: Improve type safety in encryption key handling.The type for
keyOrKeyscould be more strictly typed to prevent potential runtime errors:type EncryptionKey = string; type EncryptionKeys = EncryptionKey | EncryptionKey[]; let keyOrKeys: EncryptionKeys; // Add type guard function isValidKey(key: unknown): key is EncryptionKey { return typeof key === 'string' && key.length > 0; }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.jsonyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx(8 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
| throw new Error("This vault doesn't have any valid key, please contact hats team"); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const { encryptedData, sessionKey } = JSON.parse(encryptionResult); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Validate encryption result before parsing.
The JSON parsing of encryption result could fail or be manipulated. Add validation:
-const { encryptedData, sessionKey } = JSON.parse(encryptionResult);
+try {
+ const parsed = JSON.parse(encryptionResult);
+ if (!parsed || typeof parsed !== 'object' || !('encryptedData' in parsed) || !('sessionKey' in parsed)) {
+ throw new Error('Invalid encryption result format');
+ }
+ const { encryptedData, sessionKey } = parsed;
+} catch (error) {
+ throw new Error('Failed to parse encryption result');
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { encryptedData, sessionKey } = JSON.parse(encryptionResult); | |
| try { | |
| const parsed = JSON.parse(encryptionResult); | |
| if (!parsed || typeof parsed !== 'object' || !('encryptedData' in parsed) || !('sessionKey' in parsed)) { | |
| throw new Error('Invalid encryption result format'); | |
| } | |
| const { encryptedData, sessionKey } = parsed; | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| throw new Error('Failed to parse encryption result'); | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (5)
97-103: Optimize memoization dependencies.The current memoization depends on the entire
fieldsarray, which could cause unnecessary re-renders. Consider memoizing only the required fields.const memoizedControlledDescriptions = useMemo(() => fields.map((field, index) => ({ ...field, ...watchDescriptions[index], })), - [fields, watchDescriptions] + [fields.length, watchDescriptions] );
168-196: Add debouncing to GitHub issues loading.The GitHub issues loading effect could trigger multiple times in quick succession. Consider implementing debouncing to optimize API calls.
+const debouncedLoadGithubIssues = useCallback( + debounce(async () => { + if (!vault || !claimedIssues || isLoadingGH) return; + + try { + setIsLoadingGH(true); + const ghIssues = await getGithubIssuesFromVault(vault); + // ... rest of the loading logic + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to load GitHub issues:', error); + } finally { + setIsLoadingGH(false); + } + }, 500), + [vault, claimedIssues] +); useEffect(() => { - const loadGithubIssues = async () => { - // ... current implementation - }; - loadGithubIssues(); + debouncedLoadGithubIssues(); + return () => debouncedLoadGithubIssues.cancel(); }, [vault, claimedIssues, isLoadingGH]);
Line range hint
216-549: Add error boundary protection for form handlers.The form handlers contain complex logic that could benefit from error boundary protection to gracefully handle runtime errors.
Consider wrapping the form sections with a custom error boundary component:
class FormErrorBoundary extends React.Component<{ children: React.ReactNode }> { state = { hasError: false }; static getDerivedStateFromError() { return { hasError: true }; } render() { if (this.state.hasError) { return <Alert type="error">Failed to render form section. Please try again.</Alert>; } return this.props.children; } }Then wrap form sections:
return ( <> + <FormErrorBoundary> {getNewIssueForm(submissionDescription, index)} + </FormErrorBoundary> </> );
550-629: Enhance encryption security measures.While the encryption implementation is solid, consider adding these security enhancements:
- Add rate limiting for encryption attempts
- Implement key rotation support
- Add encryption version tracking
const handleSaveAndDownloadDescription = async (formData: ISubmissionsDescriptionsData) => { if (!vault) return; if (!submissionData) return alert("Please fill previous steps first."); + + // Add rate limiting + const encryptionAttempts = sessionStorage.getItem('encryptionAttempts') || '0'; + if (parseInt(encryptionAttempts) > 5) { + throw new Error('Too many encryption attempts. Please try again later.'); + } + sessionStorage.setItem('encryptionAttempts', (parseInt(encryptionAttempts) + 1).toString()); try { setIsLoadingGH(true); let keyOrKeys: string | string[]; + // Add encryption version + const ENCRYPTION_VERSION = '1'; // ... rest of the encryption logic let submissionInfo: ISubmissionMessageObject = { ref: submissionData.ref, isEncryptedByHats: isPrivateAudit, decrypted: isPrivateAudit ? await encryptWithHatsKey(decrypted ?? "--Nothing decrypted--") : decrypted, encrypted: encryptedData, + encryptionVersion: ENCRYPTION_VERSION, };
633-688: Optimize rendering performance for large lists.Consider using virtualization for better performance with large lists of submissions.
+import { FixedSizeList as List } from 'react-window'; - {visibleDescriptions.map((submissionDescription, index) => ( + <List + height={400} + itemCount={visibleDescriptions.length} + itemSize={35} + width="100%" + > + {({ index, style }) => { + const submissionDescription = visibleDescriptions[index]; + return ( <StyledSubmissionDescription key={submissionDescription.id} isEncrypted={!!submissionDescription.isEncrypted}> {/* ... existing render logic ... */} </StyledSubmissionDescription> + ); + }} + </List> - ))}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx(8 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/web/src/pages/Submissions/SubmissionFormPage/FormSteps/SubmissionDescriptions/SubmissionDescriptions.tsx (1)
1-45: LGTM! Well-organized imports and styled components.The imports are properly structured and the styled component extension for the load more trigger is well-implemented.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Dependencies
react-intersection-observerlibrary to improve component rendering and performance.New Features
Performance Improvements
UI/UX Enhancements