feat: Add new Sonic tokens, some SVM tooling drive-bys

[tkporter]

Description

Drive-bys for the SVM tooling:

• make sure that metadata for an SVM synthetic matches some basic expectations, e.g.
  • points to a legit machine readable URL (we had an issue here once)
  • image is a valid URL that's queryable
  • symbol / name match the token config (we had an issue here once)
• No longer require explicitly specifying if a collateral token is SPL Token or SPL Token 2022. We imply this instead by looking at the owner of the collateral mint. Removes this from all previous configs

And adds the following tokens between Solana and Sonic: sSOL, USDStar, USDC, USDT, SONIC

Drive-by changes

Related issues

Backward compatibility

Testing

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: aab83ef

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.53%. Comparing base (4ddbd60) to head (aab83ef).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5334   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   77.53%   77.53%           
=======================================
  Files         103      103           
  Lines        2110     2110           
  Branches      190      190           
=======================================
  Hits         1636     1636           
  Misses        453      453           
  Partials       21       21           

Components	Coverage Δ
core	87.80% <ø> (ø)
hooks	79.39% <ø> (ø)
isms	83.68% <ø> (ø)
token	91.27% <ø> (ø)
middlewares	79.80% <ø> (ø)

[paulbalaji]

lgtm but would also appreciate a second review from @daniel-savu on the rust improvements