Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

fix: update todo-issue-reopener hash #1415

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ianlewis
Copy link
Owner

@ianlewis ianlewis commented Feb 2, 2024

Description:

Updates the hash for todo-issue-reopener to the correct value.

Related Issues:

Updates #1367

Checklist:

  • Review the CONTRIBUTING.md documentation.
  • Add a reference to a related issue in the repository.
  • Add a description of the changes proposed in the pull request.
  • Add unit tests if applicable.
  • Update documentation if applicable.
  • Add a note in the CHANGELOG.md if applicable.
  • Sign the Google CLA.

Signed-off-by: Ian Lewis <ianmlewis@gmail.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (af5f9ca) 82.09% compared to head (0a71102) 82.09%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1415   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.09%   82.09%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        1078     1078           
  Branches       17       17           
=======================================
  Hits          885      885           
  Misses        140      140           
  Partials       53       53           

@ianlewis ianlewis merged commit aaf1d33 into main Feb 2, 2024
35 checks passed
@ianlewis ianlewis deleted the update-todo-issue-reopener-hash branch February 2, 2024 05:14
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant