Consider Elaboration in infix grammar #216
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Infix grammar handles multiline cases like `plus`.
however elaboration scripts know the terms `(x), `{x} and `{{x}}
resulting in unclosed backticks which trip the grammar.
This is an attempt to exclude these special cases in the handling
of infix functions.
justjoheinz
changed the title
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Infix grammar handles multiline cases like
plus.however elaboration scripts know the terms
(x),{x} and `{{x}}resulting in unclosed backticks which trip the grammar.
This is an attempt to exclude these special cases in the handling
of infix functions.
Fixes #188