Gender neutral language in the docs #745
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I agree, in this case |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 8.0.2 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the docs, I noticed there is an assumption in the example about the assistant's gender. This diff changes the text.
I had a version using "they" but when reading that back I was worried that non-native English speakers may get confused in this particular example since it is very early on in the docs and the example itself only serves as an elaboration of how draft state works. The version in this PR has the most clarity in my opinion, but I know that can be subjective. Happy to change it!