Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Added __volatile__, __volatile and __restrict__ GNU keywords #52

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 15, 2020

Conversation

t11230
Copy link
Contributor

@t11230 t11230 commented Aug 8, 2020

Resolves #23

Copy link
Owner

@inducer inducer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Again, thanks for working on this! Same comments as #53: Please fix flake8, and let me know whether you'd be willing to implement a round-trip test.

@t11230 t11230 force-pushed the volatile-restrict-keywords branch from 7c0c33f to 42e3942 Compare August 9, 2020 15:31
@t11230
Copy link
Contributor Author

t11230 commented Aug 15, 2020

Not sure if you've had a chance to look at this PR but it should be good to go now. I added the round-trip tests like we talked about on the other PR I made. Thanks!

@inducer
Copy link
Owner

inducer commented Aug 15, 2020

Thanks for the reminder, and sorry about the delay. I must have missed the email when you pushed the change. This looks good to me. Thanks for working on this!

@inducer inducer merged commit bb42bc8 into inducer:master Aug 15, 2020
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

add support for __volatile__, and __restrict__
2 participants