-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
naming of classes (task, point) #34
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Comments
Hi @OneCyrus, Thanks for using our library. I was looking how it's solved in other tools:
So I think the good and permanent solution will be change the What do you think? Is it suitable for you? |
these names sound like a good alternative. and keeping them in sync with the v1 client would help someone who is migrating from v1. |
Hi @OneCyrus, The issue is fixed in 1.1.0 milestone. If you would like to use a preview version use our nightly build:
Regards |
it's unfortunate that influxdb reuses some very common class names in the c# ecosystem. especially the name Task has some bad side effects. after using the namespace
InfluxDB.Client.Api.Domain
the common async/await pattern (System.Threading.Tasks.Task) is in conflict with InfluxDB. the same with the point class. Maybe different classnames could come a long way in improving the usability of this library.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: