-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 233
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
spec: ipfs:
and ipns:
URI schemes
#138
Labels
status/ready
Ready to be worked
Comments
ghost
changed the title
Spec of ipfs: and fs: URI schemes
Spec of ipfs: and fs: URI schemes
Jan 10, 2017
daviddias
changed the title
Spec of ipfs: and fs: URI schemes
spec: Feb 13, 2017
ipfs:
and fs:
URI schemes
A year passed, I think this issue should be renamed to have "spec: Ref. #139 (comment), #152 (comment) |
ghost
changed the title
spec:
spec: Nov 3, 2017
ipfs:
and fs:
URI schemesipfs:
and dweb:
URI schemes
Thanks! Good catch |
Any update on this? |
See current consensus at: Mid-term plan is to move it to docs.ipfs.io: ipfs-inactive/docs#91 (comment) |
pawal
added a commit
to pawal/specs
that referenced
this issue
Oct 22, 2019
lidel
changed the title
spec:
spec: Sep 1, 2022
ipfs:
and dweb:
URI schemesipfs:
and ipns:
URI schemes
Closed
This issue can please also include documentation of URLs starting with https://ipfs.io/ipfs/ As per #307 |
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
As a follow up of ipfs/kubo#1678 (comment) we should have clear specs for those URI schemes, in including
web+
prefixed ones.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: