Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

spec: ipfs: and ipns: URI schemes #138

Open
Tracked by #248
Kubuxu opened this issue Sep 30, 2016 · 5 comments
Open
Tracked by #248

spec: ipfs: and ipns: URI schemes #138

Kubuxu opened this issue Sep 30, 2016 · 5 comments
Labels
status/ready Ready to be worked

Comments

@Kubuxu
Copy link
Member

Kubuxu commented Sep 30, 2016

As a follow up of ipfs/kubo#1678 (comment) we should have clear specs for those URI schemes, in including web+ prefixed ones.

@ghost ghost changed the title Spec of ipfs: and fs: URI schemes Spec of ipfs: and fs: URI schemes Jan 10, 2017
@ghost ghost added the status/ready Ready to be worked label Jan 10, 2017
@daviddias daviddias changed the title Spec of ipfs: and fs: URI schemes spec: ipfs: and fs: URI schemes Feb 13, 2017
@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Nov 3, 2017

A year passed, I think this issue should be renamed to have "spec: ipfs:// and dweb:", no? :)

Ref. #139 (comment), #152 (comment)

@ghost ghost changed the title spec: ipfs: and fs: URI schemes spec: ipfs: and dweb: URI schemes Nov 3, 2017
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 3, 2017

Thanks! Good catch

@da2x
Copy link

da2x commented Oct 1, 2018

Any update on this?

@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Oct 1, 2018

See current consensus at:

Mid-term plan is to move it to docs.ipfs.io: ipfs-inactive/docs#91 (comment)
Long-term is to write a spec and add it to this repo

pawal added a commit to pawal/specs that referenced this issue Oct 22, 2019
@lidel lidel changed the title spec: ipfs: and dweb: URI schemes spec: ipfs: and ipns: URI schemes Sep 1, 2022
@fulldecent
Copy link

This issue can please also include documentation of URLs starting with https://ipfs.io/ipfs/

As per #307

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
status/ready Ready to be worked
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants