Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

chore: enable all rules of perfsprint linter #6164

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 7, 2024

Conversation

mmorel-35
Copy link
Contributor

@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 commented Nov 5, 2024

Description of the changes

How was this change tested?

  • CI

Checklist

Signed-off-by: Matthieu MOREL <matthieu.morel35@gmail.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.47%. Comparing base (0a24f6d) to head (9de0146).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6164   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.47%   96.47%           
=======================================
  Files         354      354           
  Lines       20126    20126           
=======================================
  Hits        19417    19417           
  Misses        524      524           
  Partials      185      185           
Flag Coverage Δ
badger_v1 8.31% <0.00%> (ø)
badger_v2 1.67% <0.00%> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v1 14.39% <0.00%> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2 1.61% <0.00%> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v1 14.39% <0.00%> (ø)
cassandra-5.x-v2 1.61% <0.00%> (ø)
elasticsearch-6.x-v1 18.60% <66.66%> (ø)
elasticsearch-7.x-v1 18.68% <66.66%> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v1 18.85% <66.66%> (ø)
elasticsearch-8.x-v2 1.67% <0.00%> (ø)
grpc_v1 9.48% <0.00%> (ø)
grpc_v2 7.00% <0.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
kafka-v1 8.88% <0.00%> (ø)
kafka-v2 1.67% <0.00%> (ø)
memory_v2 1.66% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
opensearch-1.x-v1 18.72% <66.66%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v1 18.73% <66.66%> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2 1.66% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
tailsampling-processor 0.46% <0.00%> (ø)
unittests 95.38% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2024 06:29
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 5, 2024 06:29
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 requested a review from pavolloffay November 5, 2024 06:29
@@ -138,11 +139,11 @@ func (e *bridgeFieldEncoder) AddTime(key string, value time.Time) {
}

func (e *bridgeFieldEncoder) AddUint(key string, value uint) {
e.pairs = append(e.pairs, attribute.String(key, fmt.Sprintf("%d", value)))
e.pairs = append(e.pairs, attribute.String(key, strconv.FormatUint(uint64(value), 10)))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this better?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is more performant

}

func (e *bridgeFieldEncoder) AddUint64(key string, value uint64) {
e.pairs = append(e.pairs, attribute.String(key, fmt.Sprintf("%d", value)))
e.pairs = append(e.pairs, attribute.String(key, strconv.FormatUint(value, 10)))
Copy link
Member

@yurishkuro yurishkuro Nov 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks way uglier than sprintf

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understand, this is more performant

@yurishkuro yurishkuro merged commit 38a9993 into jaegertracing:main Nov 7, 2024
51 of 52 checks passed
@mmorel-35 mmorel-35 deleted the golangci-lint/perfsprint branch November 7, 2024 18:08
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants