-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Is seqex still relevant? #9
Comments
Hello Yehonathan, I would say that clojure.spec is a good replacement for seqex. One simple Regards and good luck coding, On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Yehonathan Sharvit <
|
Makes sense. Thx On Thu, Nov 17, 2016, 23:44 Jonathan Claggett notifications@github.com
|
@jclaggett @Chouser
I really enjoyed your talk at ClojureConj 2013!
But I have a question: now that we have
clojure.spec
, do we still needseqex
?The only thing I don't see in
clojure.spec
issyndoc
. But maybe there is more.cc: @trptcolin @rahulkavale
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: