Introduce support for size-optimized Jenkinsfile Runner packages (2Mb) #449
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
It is working 🥳 Will merge so that we see the new 'latest' bits |
oleg-nenashev
changed the title
This was referenced Dec 14, 2020
Closed
oleg-nenashev
changed the title
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
With this patch, now it is actually possible to package Jenkinsfile Runner separately from the Jenkins core and plugins. The default
apppackaging and vanilla images have been migrated to this approach.Depends on jenkinsci/plugin-installation-manager-tool#243 for a full fix (PIM does not support the desired packaging layout)