Added Framework Search Paths to ExampleModel project (#100)

[darkhonor]

Pull request checklist

• All tests pass. Demo project builds and runs.
• I have resolved any merge conflicts.
• I have followed the coding style, and reviewed the contributing guidelines.

This fixes issue #100

What's in this pull request?

Added Search Framework Path to the ExampleModel project to locate the JSQCoreDataKit.framework built during carthage build

[jessesquires]

Thanks @darkhonor !

[tonyarnold]

I don't think this is the correct solution to the problem at hand. Unless Carthage needs to run tests, it shouldn't be building the example models. You probably want to make the schemes for the example models not shared. Carthage doesn't build any targets that don't have shared schemes.

[jessesquires]

Thanks @tonyarnold! -- Yeah, that was my initial reaction. Then I realized that schemes need to be shared for travis. So I was like ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Maybe we don't need this:
https://github.com/jessesquires/JSQCoreDataKit/blob/develop/.travis.yml#L47

since that ExampleModel project should get built implicitly via the Example project...

[tonyarnold]

I'll pull it out of my branch, xcodebuild should handle it for us.

[jessesquires]

@darkhonor Let's try:

• Revert these changes
• Make ExampleModel not shared

[codecov-io]

Current coverage is 90.36% (diff: 100%)

Merging #101 into develop will not change coverage

@@            develop       #101   diff @@
==========================================
  Files            13         13          
  Lines           394        394          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches          0          0          
==========================================
  Hits            356        356          
  Misses           38         38          
  Partials          0          0          

Powered by Codecov. Last update e4c4abc...b2278ce

[darkhonor]

@jessesquires , made the suggested changes. Let me know what you think

[jessesquires]

Thanks @darkhonor !

The first commit is still in here, but it looks like #102 takes care of that + updating travis.

Going to close this in favor of #102, but we'll still give you credit in the release notes! 😄