You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I've a problem with the parameter, slice thickness, in Catphan600's analysis. The correct value should be double of the value that I obtain.
I suposse that the problem is in the function:
' def meas_slice_thickness(self):
return np.mean(sorted(roi.wire_fwhmself.mm_per_pixel0.42 for roi in self.thickness_rois.values()))/(1+2*self.pad)'
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi jmbm94,
Can you provide a little more information? Have you tried in another QA program? What are the actual values? If you know the correct value then it sounds like you don't need any measurements; you can simply double the value pylinac provides.
Yes, I do. I tried it with AutoQA Lite and this parameter is introduced in CT by me, so I know the actual value.
It's a bit strange because, using the same protocol and phantom but different acquisitions, the result sometimes is evaluated correctly but other times gives a wrong value. The different acquisition were performed without changing the phantom position.
Sorry about the previous post, when I said 'The correct value should be double of the value that I obtain', it was wrong. I have performed more acquisitions and the measurement of the slice thickness is not always the half value of the nominal value.
Hi,
I've a problem with the parameter, slice thickness, in Catphan600's analysis. The correct value should be double of the value that I obtain.
I suposse that the problem is in the function:
' def meas_slice_thickness(self):
return np.mean(sorted(roi.wire_fwhmself.mm_per_pixel0.42 for roi in self.thickness_rois.values()))/(1+2*self.pad)'
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: