Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Upgrade Shiny server to 2024.12 #1400

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 11, 2025
Merged

Conversation

rgaiacs
Copy link
Contributor

@rgaiacs rgaiacs commented Jan 27, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@manics manics left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tests are passing but I don't know how thorough they are- have you tested this yourself?

@rgaiacs
Copy link
Contributor Author

rgaiacs commented Feb 5, 2025

have you tested this yourself?

I will test with some friends that use R and report back.

@manics
Copy link
Member

manics commented Feb 11, 2025

I found some time to do a basic test of this and it seems fine. Though more testing from real users is always useful!

@manics manics merged commit 0550173 into jupyterhub:main Feb 11, 2025
19 checks passed
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants