Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Bump calico to 3.29.1 #5443

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

Conversation

juanluisvaladas
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Bump calico to 3.29.1

Updated CRDs and RBAC.

The inttests are pointing to a temporary image. Must be modified to the default value before merging

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Manual test
  • Auto test added

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • My commit messages are signed-off
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

Signed-off-by: Juan-Luis de Sousa-Valadas Castaño <jvaladas@mirantis.com>
@juanluisvaladas juanluisvaladas force-pushed the calico-3.29.1 branch 2 times, most recently from a7ed7cc to 20f21fc Compare January 16, 2025 21:25
@juanluisvaladas juanluisvaladas marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2025 21:26
@juanluisvaladas juanluisvaladas requested review from a team as code owners January 16, 2025 21:26
@juanluisvaladas juanluisvaladas requested review from ncopa and kke January 16, 2025 21:26
Copy link
Member

@twz123 twz123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm wondering if we have a cluster upgrade integration test that uses Calico as the CNI. Just to make sure that a simple upgrade works just fine.

@juanluisvaladas
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've been testing this for a while after a manual upgrade. At this point I'm comfortable merging this.

@juanluisvaladas juanluisvaladas merged commit 46b5ee1 into k0sproject:main Jan 17, 2025
94 checks passed
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants