-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
typeUserAttrs checkbox label does not use i18n value #1391
Comments
Hi @mtthwprtchrd please give PR #1392 a go, it should resolve your issue. Also note that in your codepen |
Hi @lucasnetau Thank you very much for the quick response. Your PR #1392 resolves my issue. Thanks, the "check-box" was just a typo. I found another somewhat related issue but I've raised a separate item for that #1394. |
## [3.9.11](v3.9.10...v3.9.11) (2023-09-12) ### Bug Fixes * i18n is a straight key/value pair, it does not contain a get() function ([ebe59ce](ebe59ce)) * If no value was set for a numberAttribute the value attribute's value was used instead. This causes min/max/step/rows/maxLen number attributes to incorrectly be assigned a value if they are not set in formData but a number exists in the value attribute ([28b1a6f](28b1a6f)) * Use the i18n translated label for boolean typeUserAttrs. Fixes [#1391](#1391) ([bc04612](bc04612))
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 3.9.11 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Description:
When adding a readonly checkbox attribute to a text field the label does not use the value specified in the i18n structure whereas the name attribute of a text field will use the i18n value.
Environment Details:
Expected Behavior
A typeUserAttrs checkbox sub-type should retrieve it's label from the i18n structure.
Actual Behavior
A typeUserAttrs checkbox sub-type retrieves it's label from the i18n structure.
Steps to Reproduce
Single page repro.
Drag a text field onto the form builder
Edit the component
The name attribute is renamed to Field Id from the i18n structure
The Read-only field takes its label from the attribute name instead of the i18n structure.
See this code pen https://codepen.io/Matthew-Pritchard/pen/KKbPbxQ for a repro of the problem (adapted from the original i18n sample https://codepen.io/kevinchappell/pen/EMqvbG)
Screenshot - (optional)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: