Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 18, 2024. It is now read-only.

P0332 confusing statement in one section, and do we need more conversion examples? #64

Open
crtrott opened this issue Feb 12, 2018 · 0 comments

Comments

@crtrott
Copy link
Member

crtrott commented Feb 12, 2018

Proposed: [dcl.array] 11.3.4 Arrays, p3

There is a thing which starts with "In addition" which is confusing. How is it "in addition" if we just said "any" bound can be omitted. Maybe it should be more something like: "If only the first of the constant expressions that specify the bounds of the arrays is omitted, the incomplete array type may be used: "​

Also do we want to have a more complete example catalogue for matching? Though all the other ones are probably not ambiguous.

Otherwise this looks much better than before. I would be convinced ;-)

hcedwar added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2018
# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant