Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Container-port flag is deprecated #25072

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2016

Conversation

adohe-zz
Copy link

@adohe-zz adohe-zz commented May 3, 2016

Refer #25039 for more detail. @Kargakis ptal. Also in this PR just mark this flag as deprecated, we should also remove the code in the future.

@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot added kind/old-docs size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 3, 2016
@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@smarterclayton @bgrant0607 WDYT?

@k8s-github-robot
Copy link

@adohe
You must link to the test flake issue which caused you to request this manual re-test.
Re-test requests should be in the form of: k8s-bot test this issue: #<number>
Here is the list of open test flakes.

@adohe-zz
Copy link
Author

adohe-zz commented May 3, 2016

@k8s-bot test this issue: #23974

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@smarterclayton smarterclayton added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 3, 2016
@k8s-github-robot k8s-github-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 3, 2016
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@

- [v1.3.0-alpha.3](#v130-alpha3)
- [Downloads](#downloads)
- [v1.3.0-alpha.3](#v130-alpha3)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this added?

@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented May 3, 2016

Is the policy to add release-note to deprecations? I think we should do that.

@luxas luxas added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed release-note-label-needed labels May 4, 2016
@luxas
Copy link
Member

luxas commented May 4, 2016

Okay, it's worthy a release note as it changes the ux. cc/ @david-mcmahon
Is it okay if I'm adding back lgtm, given the multiple ones already?

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added release-note-action-required Denotes a PR that introduces potentially breaking changes that require user action. and removed release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels May 4, 2016
@bgrant0607
Copy link
Member

Thanks, LGTM.

Deprecations belong in the "action required" section of the release notes. I updated that label.

@bgrant0607 bgrant0607 added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 4, 2016
@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented May 6, 2016

GCE e2e build/test passed for commit ba69f0f.

@roberthbailey roberthbailey merged commit bb08b27 into kubernetes:master May 6, 2016
@adohe-zz adohe-zz deleted the deprecate_container_port branch May 7, 2016 08:27
@erictune erictune changed the title mark container-port flag as deprecated Container-port flag is deprecated Jul 2, 2016
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-action-required Denotes a PR that introduces potentially breaking changes that require user action. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants