-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 164
fix: adding trace i/o in langfuse openai integration #532
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
bf67f55
fix: adding the i/o in the langfuse openai integration
noble-varghese 69dd2f2
fix: fixing the i/o in stream and async cases
noble-varghese dd021d0
fix: check for trace-id in async and sync streaming
noble-varghese 03ea6b8
fix: check for trace-id in async and sync streaming
noble-varghese 21f7407
fix: returning a is_nested bool to identify the nested functionality
noble-varghese 36ae5e8
Merge branch 'main' into noble-varghese/fix-trace-input-output
noble-varghese 4ab3d62
tests: Tests for checking input and output in traces
noble-varghese e211b74
Merge branch 'noble-varghese/fix-trace-input-output' of github.com:la…
noble-varghese bb4970d
test: added trace to check scenario where trace_id is provided by use…
noble-varghese aa5152f
Merge branch 'main' into noble-varghese/fix-trace-input-output
maxdeichmann File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was wondering if we could return a nested function bool from the existing function which would make the implementation easier to review and also possibly reduce the touch points in the code. If we change, we change on ly inside the function and rest should fall in place.