Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Require the protocol id when creating a new DHT or DHT client. #704

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

e0ff
Copy link

@e0ff e0ff commented Jan 12, 2021

No description provided.

@BigLep BigLep requested a review from Stebalien March 22, 2021 15:18
@BigLep BigLep added the need/maintainers-input Needs input from the current maintainer(s) label Mar 22, 2021
@BigLep BigLep requested review from aschmahmann and removed request for Stebalien March 22, 2021 15:18
@BigLep
Copy link

BigLep commented Mar 22, 2021

@aschmahmann will respond on what we think we should do and why. There are some design considerations here.

@aschmahmann
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @endoffile78, as I mentioned in #702 I'd like to do this (and have separate IPFS and libp2p DHT structs) but given that it's a breaking change I'd like to bundle it with some actual utility.

This probably means some bigger thinking like #584.

I'm going to close this and #702 for now, but thanks for the poke/reminder about this.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
need/maintainers-input Needs input from the current maintainer(s)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants