This repository has been archived by the owner on May 26, 2022. It is now read-only.
avoid assigning a function to a variable #239
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
marten-seemann
force-pushed
the
avoid-func-in-variable
branch
from
c34eec7 to
d5c6295
Compare
Stebalien
approved these changes
Feb 12, 2021
27 tasks
# for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
#.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No functional change expected. I believe defining the function on the struct itself is more efficient than assigning it to a variable.
Really, a lambda should only be used to capture a variable, which is not done here.