Update github actions to the latest versions #1026
Conversation
Tests passed ✓, Code: |, Stack: |, Structs: |
|
|
Thanks for this, looks like @geky-bot is still having a bit of issue since we were relying on the original artifact merging behavior. Will poke around and see if there's a fix. |
|
Looks like there's a merge-on-download option: https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact/blob/main/docs/MIGRATION.md#multiple-uploads-to-the-same-named-artifact Will experiment, I have another fork of the repo for this. There's a few delicate steps (release scripts) that rely on artifacts. |
geky
force-pushed
the
update-gh-actions
branch
from
41a5106 to
355ede0
Compare
|
Pushed up a couple changes to fix things, tested here: geky/littlefs-test-repo#10 Also tweaked a couple things while editing/testing this:
Let me know if this looks good to you, and I can go ahead and merge this into the devel branch to unblock other PRs. |
Tests passed ✓, Code: 17064 B (+0.0%), Stack: 1440 B (+0.0%), Structs: 812 B (+0.0%)
|
Turns out major versions break things. Old behavior: Artifacts with same name are merged New behavior: Artifacts with same name error Using a pattern and merging on download should fix this at least on the job-side. Though I do wonder if we'll start running into artifact limit issues with the new way artifacts are handled...
Looks like cross-workflow downloads has finally been added to the standard download-artifact action, so we might as well switch to it to reduce dependencies. dawidd6's version was also missing the merge-multiple feature which is necessary to work around breaking changes in download-artifact's v4 bump. Weirdly it needs GITHUB_TOKEN for some reason? Not sure why this couldn't be implicit.
With GitHub forcibly deprecating old versions of actions, pinning the minor/patch version is more likely to cause breakage than not.
geky
force-pushed
the
update-gh-actions
branch
from
355ede0 to
798073c
Compare
Tests passed ✓, Code: 17064 B (+0.0%), Stack: 1440 B (+0.0%), Structs: 812 B (+0.0%)
|
oops, i was not aware of the merging behavior. |
|
To be fair it is pretty unintuitive behavior, but it was useful. I wonder if we'll see more issues with hitting the artifact limit with GitHub's changes. |
|
Merging |
|
Whoops looks like a missed a line and ended up limiting statuses to x86 only. Fixing here: #1053 I sure do love the GitHub Actions user experience /s |
No description provided.