Skip to content

added a new line #256

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

pushprajnaik
Copy link

Edited printModule function.

Edited printModule function.
@repo-lockdown
Copy link

repo-lockdown bot commented Oct 2, 2020

This repository does not accept pull requests. Please follow http://llvm.org/docs/Contributing.html#how-to-submit-a-patch for contribution to LLVM.

@repo-lockdown repo-lockdown bot closed this Oct 2, 2020
@repo-lockdown repo-lockdown bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 2, 2020
@erichkeane erichkeane added the invalid Resolved as invalid, i.e. not a bug label Oct 2, 2020
@asl asl added the spam label Oct 3, 2020
pysuxing pushed a commit to pysuxing/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
pysuxing pushed a commit to pysuxing/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
keryell pushed a commit to keryell/llvm-project that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2024
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
xlauko pushed a commit to trailofbits/instafix-llvm that referenced this pull request Mar 28, 2025
I think it's time to claim that CIR supports recursive types (many
thanks to llvm#303 and to @sitio-couto :) )
And we can bring back the `get_member` verification back, with no checks
for incomplete types. What do you think?

And we can close llvm#256 as well
# for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? #.
Labels
invalid Resolved as invalid, i.e. not a bug
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants