Skip to content

[LLD] [docs] Add a release note for the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH support #81388

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 16, 2024

Conversation

mstorsjo
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@mstorsjo mstorsjo added this to the LLVM 18.X Release milestone Feb 10, 2024
@llvmbot llvmbot added the lld label Feb 10, 2024
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 10, 2024

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld

Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo)

Changes

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81388.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst (+5)
diff --git a/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index fa0e7f2bc0b3ea..82f9d93b8e86ab 100644
--- a/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -86,6 +86,11 @@ COFF Improvements
 * LLD now prefers library paths specified with ``-libpath:`` over the implicitly
   detected toolchain paths.
 
+* Use the ``SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH`` environment variable for the PE header and
+  debug directory timestamps, if neither the ``/Brepro`` nor ``/timestamp:``
+  options have been specified. This makes the linker output reproducible by
+  setting this environment variable.
+
 MinGW Improvements
 ------------------
 

@mstorsjo
Copy link
Member Author

This goes along with/after #81384 (which is approved but not yet merged).

@mstorsjo mstorsjo requested a review from MaskRay February 10, 2024 23:17
@mstorsjo
Copy link
Member Author

@tstellar Can this be merged? It has been approved. I'd like to add more release notes here, which would go on top of this.

@tstellar tstellar merged commit 8391421 into llvm:release/18.x Feb 16, 2024
@mstorsjo mstorsjo deleted the lld-source-date-epoch-relnotes branch February 16, 2024 09:12
@pointhex pointhex mentioned this pull request May 7, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants