-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.3k
[RISCV][ISel] Fix types in tryFoldSelectIntoOp
#90659
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v Author: Yingwei Zheng (dtcxzyw) Changes
Fix #90652. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90659.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
index 417ff19404a452..19ef1f2f18ec1a 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelLowering.cpp
@@ -15421,7 +15421,7 @@ static SDValue tryFoldSelectIntoOp(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
EVT VT = N->getValueType(0);
SDLoc DL(N);
SDValue OtherOp = TrueVal.getOperand(1 - OpToFold);
- EVT OtherOpVT = OtherOp->getValueType(0);
+ EVT OtherOpVT = OtherOp.getValueType();
SDValue IdentityOperand =
DAG.getNeutralElement(Opc, DL, OtherOpVT, N->getFlags());
if (!Commutative)
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr90652.ll b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr90652.ll
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..2162395b92ac3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/RISCV/pr90652.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 4
+; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=riscv64 | FileCheck %s
+
+define i1 @test(i64 %x, i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: test:
+; CHECK: # %bb.0: # %entry
+; CHECK-NEXT: addi a3, a0, 1
+; CHECK-NEXT: slt a0, a3, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT: not a1, a1
+; CHECK-NEXT: and a0, a1, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT: or a0, a2, a0
+; CHECK-NEXT: ret
+entry:
+ %sadd = call { i64, i1 } @llvm.sadd.with.overflow.i64(i64 %x, i64 1)
+ %ov = extractvalue { i64, i1 } %sadd, 1
+ %or = or i1 %cond2, %ov
+ %sel = select i1 %cond1, i1 %cond2, i1 %or
+ ret i1 %sel
+}
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
/cherry-pick 2647bd7 |
``` SelectionDAG has 17 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t6: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %2 t8: i1 = truncate t6 t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1 t7: i1 = truncate t4 t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t10: i64,i1 = saddo t2, Constant:i64<1> t11: i1 = or t8, t10:1 t12: i1 = select t7, t8, t11 t13: i64 = any_extend t12 t15: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $x10, t13 t16: ch = RISCVISD::RET_GLUE t15, Register:i64 $x10, t15:1 ``` `OtherOpVT` should be i1, but `OtherOp->getValueType(0)` returns `i64`, which ignores `ResNo` in `SDValue`. Fix llvm#90652. (cherry picked from commit 2647bd7)
/pull-request #90682 |
``` SelectionDAG has 17 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t6: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %2 t8: i1 = truncate t6 t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1 t7: i1 = truncate t4 t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t10: i64,i1 = saddo t2, Constant:i64<1> t11: i1 = or t8, t10:1 t12: i1 = select t7, t8, t11 t13: i64 = any_extend t12 t15: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $x10, t13 t16: ch = RISCVISD::RET_GLUE t15, Register:i64 $x10, t15:1 ``` `OtherOpVT` should be i1, but `OtherOp->getValueType(0)` returns `i64`, which ignores `ResNo` in `SDValue`. Fix llvm#90652. (cherry picked from commit 2647bd7)
Hi @dtcxzyw (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR. |
``` SelectionDAG has 17 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t6: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %2 t8: i1 = truncate t6 t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1 t7: i1 = truncate t4 t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t10: i64,i1 = saddo t2, Constant:i64<1> t11: i1 = or t8, t10:1 t12: i1 = select t7, t8, t11 t13: i64 = any_extend t12 t15: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $x10, t13 t16: ch = RISCVISD::RET_GLUE t15, Register:i64 $x10, t15:1 ``` `OtherOpVT` should be i1, but `OtherOp->getValueType(0)` returns `i64`, which ignores `ResNo` in `SDValue`. Fix llvm#90652. (cherry picked from commit 2647bd7)
``` SelectionDAG has 17 nodes: t0: ch,glue = EntryToken t6: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %2 t8: i1 = truncate t6 t4: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %1 t7: i1 = truncate t4 t2: i64,ch = CopyFromReg t0, Register:i64 %0 t10: i64,i1 = saddo t2, Constant:i64<1> t11: i1 = or t8, t10:1 t12: i1 = select t7, t8, t11 t13: i64 = any_extend t12 t15: ch,glue = CopyToReg t0, Register:i64 $x10, t13 t16: ch = RISCVISD::RET_GLUE t15, Register:i64 $x10, t15:1 ``` `OtherOpVT` should be i1, but `OtherOp->getValueType(0)` returns `i64`, which ignores `ResNo` in `SDValue`. Fix llvm#90652. (cherry picked from commit 2647bd7)
OtherOpVT
should be i1, butOtherOp->getValueType(0)
returnsi64
, which ignoresResNo
inSDValue
.Fix #90652.