[2.0.X] Drop support for Alpine docker image

[louislam]

Description

As title, for 2.0.X only.

Type of change

Please delete any options that are not relevant.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• User interface (UI)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Translation update
• Other
• This change requires a documentation update

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I ran ESLint and other linters for modified files
• I have performed a self-review of my own code and tested it
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  (including JSDoc for methods)
• My changes generate no new warnings
• My code needed automated testing. I have added them (this is optional task)

Screenshots (if any)

Please do not use any external image service. Instead, just paste in or drag and drop the image here, and it will be uploaded automatically.

[0x1a8510f2]

Why not just switch to the alpine image? Alpine tends to be the go-to choice for containers because it's small.

[mhkarimi1383]

Why? Alpine and NodeJS are good together
I think lots of users are using alpine images since it's more minimal and fast to deploy

[louislam]

Please search "Alpine" in the repo. There are a lot of issues related to the Alpine base previously.

Also try to sesrch "alpine dns issue" in Google. You will find that it is almost a known issue.

The default image of Uptime Kuma was actually switched to debian-slim from Apline. It is more stable and small too as I can see.

[mhkarimi1383]

Oh I See
I thing that's because of Alpine is not GNU/Linux

[mhkarimi1383]

after marge of 2.0.X I should have some changes in ansible branch