Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Replace task code with LuckyTask #622

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 6, 2021
Merged

Replace task code with LuckyTask #622

merged 3 commits into from
Apr 6, 2021

Conversation

matthewmcgarvey
Copy link
Member

Fixes #620

In #621 I experimented with completely separating the CLI code from the task code but it was pointed out that we could extract a shard and that would possibly solve another problem of circular dependencies.

So I have made a LuckyTask and incorporated it into this library and removed the existing task code. This would be a bigger breaking change as we'd have to make sure we update all the places tasks are made in various libraries.

@matthewmcgarvey
Copy link
Member Author

In order for the specs to pass, Avram will have to be updated first

@matthewmcgarvey
Copy link
Member Author

There's one spec that uses lucky tasks so it will have to be updated as well before the last spec will pass

Copy link
Member

@jwoertink jwoertink left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there anything else left for this move over?

@matthewmcgarvey
Copy link
Member Author

@jwoertink Nope!

@matthewmcgarvey matthewmcgarvey merged commit d1a6ab7 into master Apr 6, 2021
@matthewmcgarvey matthewmcgarvey deleted the mm/lucky-task branch April 6, 2021 23:49
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using shard for your own tasks includes a lot of unwanted code
2 participants