-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 489
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Harmonizing feed reader
type
#7490
Conversation
Parser name is `feed reader`, but we had some apps with type `Feed Reader` or even `Feed Reader App`, which was inconsistent compared to other client types
Can the checks be rerun? It does not look like they failed because of my change, after all. |
I committed through GitHub website. Cloned the repo in GitHub Desktop, triggered recheck there, and it shows as if the check were scheduled, but I do not see any updates on website. |
You can make a test commit and remove it in another commit then push both. It will trigger the checks. |
Done. Probably need to report a bug to GitHub, too. |
Doesn't this change make the |
Yup, no need to keep them. By default we are using |
Interesting, removing the type from YAML fails the tests, though 🤔 |
No longer required, since it's now fixed value
Test was failing on YAML structure check, not the parser check. Updated the test accordingly. |
Description:
Parser name for feed readers is
feed reader
, but we had apps with typeFeed Reader
or evenFeed Reader App
, which was inconsistent compared to other client types both in terms of case and name. This little change harmonizes things.Review