Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

fix typos #38186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2025
Merged

fix typos #38186

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2025

Conversation

Josh-Cena
Copy link
Member

Fix #38185

@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena requested review from a team as code owners February 17, 2025 00:23
@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena requested review from wbamberg, estelle and pepelsbey and removed request for a team February 17, 2025 00:23
@github-actions github-actions bot added Content:CSS Cascading Style Sheets docs Content:JS JavaScript docs system [PR only] Infrastructure and configuration for the project labels Feb 17, 2025
@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena requested review from bsmth and removed request for wbamberg, estelle and pepelsbey February 17, 2025 00:23
@github-actions github-actions bot added the size/s [PR only] 6-50 LoC changed label Feb 17, 2025
@@ -267,6 +271,7 @@ screenleft-screentop
Scrupulum
seakale
serverstart
shhhh
Copy link
Contributor

@OnkarRuikar OnkarRuikar Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
shhhh

The shhhh is a wrong spelling of sh. I think hush or shush are the correct words for the context.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Uhhhh... "Shhhh" is a common way to express an elongated "sh". Like "Uhhhhh" or "ahhhhh" are the same as "uh" or "ah".

Copy link
Contributor

@OnkarRuikar OnkarRuikar Feb 17, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But how many h is the standard? Or any number of 'h' is acceptable: shh, shhh, shhhh, or sh+?

I am not trying to be critical here merge as you see fit.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any "h" is acceptable. I don't think we use it a lot anyway, but I'm okay to use sh+ here.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm okay to use sh+ here.

Is this kind of pattern supported? I thought we were limited to hardcoded string values

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that's valid in a custom dictionary. sh+ means "it must be combined with another word as a prefix to be valid". I can move it to the ignored patterns though, if so desired; I just don't think it's common enough.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can move it to the ignored patterns though, if so desired; I just don't think it's common enough.

No I think we're good, thanks 👍🏻

@OnkarRuikar
Copy link
Contributor

@bsmith, if this has stalled because of my comment, then the changes look good to me.

Copy link
Member

@bsmth bsmth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, tnx 👍🏻

@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena merged commit 5f19615 into mdn:main Feb 18, 2025
8 checks passed
@Josh-Cena Josh-Cena deleted the fix-typo branch February 18, 2025 15:01
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Content:CSS Cascading Style Sheets docs Content:JS JavaScript docs size/s [PR only] 6-50 LoC changed system [PR only] Infrastructure and configuration for the project
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Weekly spelling check
3 participants