Skip to content

Conversation

ellnix
Copy link
Contributor

@ellnix ellnix commented Jan 7, 2025

Pull Request

Related issue

Fixes #348

See related issue.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.09804% with 10 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.72%. Comparing base (ba4a8c9) to head (9e06d25).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lib/meilisearch/rails/index_settings.rb 93.39% 7 Missing ⚠️
lib/meilisearch/rails/safe_index.rb 94.87% 2 Missing ⚠️
lib/meilisearch-rails.rb 97.29% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #379      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.96%   89.72%   +0.75%     
==========================================
  Files          13       16       +3     
  Lines         761      788      +27     
==========================================
+ Hits          677      707      +30     
+ Misses         84       81       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@curquiza curquiza requested a review from brunoocasali January 8, 2025 13:20
@ellnix ellnix force-pushed the refactor-lib-meilisearch branch from 7da3be4 to 3991366 Compare January 8, 2025 21:42
ellnix added 4 commits January 8, 2025 22:55
I cannot figure out why this was ever created, all tests pass with this
change, it feels to me like this is just a roundabout way of shoving
`self` into the hash.

If there's a distinction between this logic and `self` please let me
know.
This should highlight the difference between these settings that concern
the index and meilisearch_options which are rails-specific.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactor meilisearch.rb
1 participant