Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Run assessment on how many CMO labels in SMILE are affected by the bad numbering (sample count assignment) #1373

Open
ao508 opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@ao508
Copy link
Collaborator

ao508 commented Jan 9, 2025

right... I'm seeing the same sample counter 001 linked to alt ids: A86-QJE (igo sample 12732_E_101) and A86-RFJ (igo sample 12732_E_130) in their legacy labels...

Organizing this neatly:
CMO patient ID: C-VE9EE8
Samples (igo id // alt id // legacy label // current label in smile)
12582_J_47 // A8D-7WM // C-VE9EE8-P001-r // C-VE9EE8-P001-r
12732_E_101 // A86-QJE // C-VE9EE8-L001-d // request not in smile
12732_E_130 // A86-RFJ // C-VE9EE8-U001-d // request not in smile

@ao508 ao508 changed the title Run assessment on how many CMO labels in SMILE are affected by the bad numbering (tumor count assignment) Run assessment on how many CMO labels in SMILE are affected by the bad numbering (sample count assignment) Jan 29, 2025
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant