[ISSUE #1212]🐛Fix TopicConfigSerializeWrapper unit test error

[mxsm]

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1212

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Updated test cases in the topic_config_wrapper module by commenting out assertions related to the data_version field, indicating a shift in focus for validation.

[rocketmq-rust-bot]

🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies test cases in the topic_config_wrapper.rs file by commenting out assertions related to the data_version field in the TopicConfigSerializeWrapper struct. Specifically, assertions in two tests, topic_config_and_mapping_serialize_wrapper_default and topic_config_and_mapping_serialize_wrapper_getters, have been commented out, indicating a change in focus regarding the validation of the data_version field.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/topic_info_wrapper/topic_config_wrapper.rs	Commented out assertions related to data_version in two test cases within the tests module.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Resolve unit test error for TopicConfigSerializeWrapper (#1212)	✅

Possibly related PRs

• [ISSUE #643]🐛Fix topic_config_and_mapping_serialize_wrapper_default t… #644: Addresses a bug in the topic_config_and_mapping_serialize_wrapper_default test case, directly related to the changes made in the main PR.
• [ISSUE #645]🐛Fix test case topic_config_and_mapping_serialize_wrapper_getters error #646: Fixes an error in the topic_config_and_mapping_serialize_wrapper_getters test case, involving assertions related to mapping_data_version.
• [ISSUE #1171]Fix test case TopicConfigAndMappingSerializeWrapper#topic_config_and_mapping_serialize_wrapper_getters error #1172: Specifically addresses an error in the topic_config_and_mapping_serialize_wrapper_getters test case by commenting out assertions, closely related to the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

• TeslaRustor
• mxsm

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
We comment assertions, come what may.
Data versions once held in high regard,
Now softly set aside, it’s not so hard.
With tests that hop and skip with glee,
We celebrate changes, oh so free! 🐇✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@rocketmq-rust-bot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 065b43f and 39502f8.

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.80%. Comparing base (065b43f) to head (39502f8).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1213      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   16.81%   16.80%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         427      427              
  Lines       52898    52894       -4     
==========================================
- Hits         8894     8887       -7     
- Misses      44004    44007       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.