[ISSUE #1385]🚀Add UserInfo and AclInfo #1414
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes introduce two new modules, Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rocketmq-rust-bot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 3 minutes and 44 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
|
🔊@mxsm 🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥 |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
AI review first
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1)
25-25: Consider adding module documentation in this file.While the module declarations are correct, it would be helpful to add a brief doc comment above each module declaration explaining its purpose.
+/// Module for managing Access Control List (ACL) information and policies pub mod acl_info; // ... other modules ... +/// Module for managing user information and credentials pub mod user_info;Also applies to: 45-45
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/user_info.rs (3)
23-30: Add documentation for the public struct and its fields.The
UserInfostruct and its fields should be documented to improve code maintainability and API documentation.Consider adding documentation like this:
+/// Represents user information for ACL authentication and authorization. #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Default)] #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] pub struct UserInfo { + /// The username of the user pub username: Option<CheetahString>, + /// The password of the user pub password: Option<CheetahString>, + /// The type of the user (e.g., "admin", "user") pub user_type: Option<CheetahString>, + /// The status of the user (e.g., "active", "inactive") pub user_status: Option<CheetahString>, }
23-30: Consider adding validation and security measures.A few security considerations:
- Consider adding validation for
user_typeanduser_statususing enums instead of strings to prevent invalid values- The password field might need special handling to prevent accidental logging
Would you like me to provide an example implementation using enums and password handling?
45-131: Enhance test coverage and security practices.While the test coverage is comprehensive, consider these improvements:
- Add negative test cases for invalid data
- Use test constants instead of hardcoded passwords
- Add tests for empty/whitespace values
- Add tests to verify password masking in Display output
Here's an example of additional test cases:
#[test] fn test_display_masks_password() { let user_info = UserInfo { username: Some(CheetahString::from("user")), password: Some(CheetahString::from("sensitive_password")), user_type: None, user_status: None, }; let display = format!("{}", user_info); assert!(!display.contains("sensitive_password")); assert!(display.contains("****")); } #[test] fn test_whitespace_values() { let user_info = UserInfo { username: Some(CheetahString::from(" ")), password: Some(CheetahString::from("\t")), user_type: Some(CheetahString::from("\n")), user_status: Some(CheetahString::from("")), }; // Add assertions based on how whitespace should be handled }rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/acl_info.rs (1)
44-212: Enhance test coverage with edge casesWhile the current test coverage is good, consider adding these test cases:
- Invalid decision values (e.g., "invalid")
- Empty vectors for source_ips and policies
- Large vectors to verify any size constraints
- Invalid IP addresses in source_ips
Example test case:
#[test] fn test_policy_entry_info_with_invalid_decision() { let policy_entry = PolicyEntryInfo { decision: Some(CheetahString::from("invalid_decision")), ..Default::default() }; // Add assertions based on how invalid decisions should be handled }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs(2 hunks)rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/acl_info.rs(1 hunks)rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/user_info.rs(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body.rs (1)
25-25: LGTM! Verify module documentation.
The new module declarations are well-organized and follow the project's conventions. Let's verify the documentation in these new modules.
Also applies to: 45-45
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/user_info.rs (1)
1-22: LGTM! License and imports are properly structured.
The Apache 2.0 license header is present and all imports are relevant to the implementation.
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/acl_info.rs (2)
1-212: Overall implementation looks good with some suggested improvements
The ACL implementation is well-structured and thoroughly tested. The suggested improvements are:
- Add comprehensive documentation
- Consider adding validation for field values
- Enhance test coverage with edge cases
The core functionality appears sound and ready for use.
17-19: Verify CheetahString usage pattern
The code uses CheetahString for all string fields. Let's verify this is consistent with the project's string handling patterns.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that CheetahString is consistently used throughout the RocketMQ protocol implementation for string fields, particularly in:
- Protocol structures (e.g., AclInfo, TopicRouteData, SubscriptionData)
- Request/Response headers
- Serialization/deserialization logic
- Configuration data structures
The usage pattern is consistent across the codebase, showing it's the standard string type for protocol-related data structures. This verifies that using CheetahString for all string fields in the new ACL info structures follows the established pattern in the project.
CheetahString usage is consistent with project patterns
The use of CheetahString in the new ACL info structures follows the established pattern across the RocketMQ protocol implementation, where it's consistently used for all string fields in protocol structures and headers.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for CheetahString usage patterns in other protocol structures
rg -A 3 "CheetahString" "rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/"
Length of output: 103982
| impl Display for UserInfo { | ||
| fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | ||
| write!( | ||
| f, | ||
| "UserInfo [username={}, password={}, user_type={}, user_status={}]", | ||
| self.username.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()), | ||
| self.password.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()), | ||
| self.user_type.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()), | ||
| self.user_status.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()) | ||
| ) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Secure the Display implementation to protect sensitive data.
The current Display implementation shows the password in clear text, which could lead to accidental exposure in logs.
Consider masking the password:
impl Display for UserInfo {
fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result {
write!(
f,
"UserInfo [username={}, password={}, user_type={}, user_status={}]",
self.username.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()),
- self.password.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()),
+ if self.password.is_some() { "****" } else { "" },
self.user_type.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()),
self.user_status.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new())
)
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| impl Display for UserInfo { | |
| fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | |
| write!( | |
| f, | |
| "UserInfo [username={}, password={}, user_type={}, user_status={}]", | |
| self.username.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()), | |
| self.password.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()), | |
| self.user_type.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()), | |
| self.user_status.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()) | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| impl Display for UserInfo { | |
| fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { | |
| write!( | |
| f, | |
| "UserInfo [username={}, password={}, user_type={}, user_status={}]", | |
| self.username.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()), | |
| if self.password.is_some() { "****" } else { "" }, | |
| self.user_type.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()), | |
| self.user_status.as_ref().unwrap_or(&CheetahString::new()) | |
| ) | |
| } | |
| } |
| #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Default)] | ||
| #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] | ||
| pub struct PolicyInfo { | ||
| pub policy_type: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
| pub entries: Option<Vec<PolicyEntryInfo>>, | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Default)] | ||
| #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] | ||
| pub struct AclInfo { | ||
| pub subject: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
| pub policies: Option<Vec<PolicyInfo>>, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add documentation for PolicyInfo and AclInfo structs
Similar to PolicyEntryInfo, these structs would benefit from documentation explaining their purpose and relationships.
Additionally, consider adding validation for the policy_type field values if there are specific allowed types.
| #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Default)] | ||
| #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] | ||
| pub struct PolicyEntryInfo { | ||
| pub resource: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
| pub actions: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
| pub source_ips: Option<Vec<CheetahString>>, | ||
| pub decision: Option<CheetahString>, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add documentation for PolicyEntryInfo struct and fields
Consider adding documentation comments to explain:
- The purpose of PolicyEntryInfo
- Valid values for the
decisionfield (e.g., "allow", "deny") - Expected format for
resourceandactions - Constraints on
source_ipsif any
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Default)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
+/// Represents an entry in an access control policy
+///
+/// # Fields
+/// * `resource` - The resource to which this policy applies
+/// * `actions` - Permitted or denied actions on the resource
+/// * `source_ips` - List of IP addresses this policy applies to
+/// * `decision` - Policy decision ("allow" or "deny")
pub struct PolicyEntryInfo {
pub resource: Option<CheetahString>,
pub actions: Option<CheetahString>,
pub source_ips: Option<Vec<CheetahString>>,
pub decision: Option<CheetahString>,
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Default)] | |
| #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] | |
| pub struct PolicyEntryInfo { | |
| pub resource: Option<CheetahString>, | |
| pub actions: Option<CheetahString>, | |
| pub source_ips: Option<Vec<CheetahString>>, | |
| pub decision: Option<CheetahString>, | |
| } | |
| #[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Default)] | |
| #[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")] | |
| /// Represents an entry in an access control policy | |
| /// | |
| /// # Fields | |
| /// * `resource` - The resource to which this policy applies | |
| /// * `actions` - Permitted or denied actions on the resource | |
| /// * `source_ips` - List of IP addresses this policy applies to | |
| /// * `decision` - Policy decision ("allow" or "deny") | |
| pub struct PolicyEntryInfo { | |
| pub resource: Option<CheetahString>, | |
| pub actions: Option<CheetahString>, | |
| pub source_ips: Option<Vec<CheetahString>>, | |
| pub decision: Option<CheetahString>, | |
| } |
rocketmq-rust-bot
added
approved
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #1385
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
acl_infoanduser_info.Tests